Justices to Weigh Bonus Attorneys’ Fees in Civil Rights Cases

By Mark Walsh — April 07, 2009 1 min read

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether lawyers who press civil rights cases, such as to improve a state’s foster-care system, may be awarded extra money on top of normal attorneys’ fees when they bring about major changes.

The justices on Monday granted an appeal by the state of Georgia in a case involving an award of $10.5 milllion in attorneys’ fees for lawyers who brought a class action over the state’s system for handling children in foster care

A federal district judge authorized a $4.5 million enhancement on top of a $6 million regular fee award because he concluded the lawyers provided exceptional representation and forced significant changes in the system through a consent decree.

A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, in Atlanta, upheld the attorneys’ fee bonus in a ruling last year. (The appeals court’s opinion has this great opening line: “When asked how much money would be enough for him, John D. Rockefeller reportedly said: ‘Just a little bit more.’”)

The Supreme Court’s decision to take up Perdue v. Kenny A. (Case No. 09-970) could have implications for education in that institutional-reform suits and other civil rights actions have the potentional for requiring states and school districts to pay the plaintiffs’ legal fees. The legal issue has to do with whether the extra awards are appropriate when the calculation of regular attorneys’ fees for prevailing parties already takes into account the quality of the representation and the results achieved.

Understandably, the lawyers who won the $10.5 million in fees filed a brief arguing that there was really nothing extraordinary about the extra fees and the case did not merit review. They didn’t prevail on that, and the Supreme Court will consider the case during its term that begins next October.

A version of this news article first appeared in The School Law Blog.


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Future of Work Webinar
Digital Literacy Strategies to Promote Equity
Our new world has only increased our students’ dependence on technology. This makes digital literacy no longer a “nice to have” but a “need to have.” How do we ensure that every student can navigate
Content provided by
Mathematics Online Summit Teaching Math in a Pandemic
Attend this online summit to ask questions about how COVID-19 has affected achievement, instruction, assessment, and engagement in math.
School & District Management Webinar Examining the Evidence: Catching Kids Up at a Distance
As districts, schools, and families navigate a new normal following the abrupt end of in-person schooling this spring, students’ learning opportunities vary enormously across the nation. Access to devices and broadband internet and a secure

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Speech Therapists
Lancaster, PA, US
Lancaster Lebanon IU 13
Elementary Teacher
Madison, Wisconsin
One City Schools

Read Next

Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: January 13, 2021
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Obituary In Memory of Michele Molnar, EdWeek Market Brief Writer and Editor
EdWeek Market Brief Associate Editor Michele Molnar, who was instrumental in launching the publication, succumbed to cancer.
5 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: December 9, 2020
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: Stories You May Have Missed
A collection of articles from the previous week that you may have missed.
8 min read