Published Online: November 3, 2008
Published in Print: November 5, 2008, as Increasing the Scope of 'Value Added' Approaches

Letter

Increasing the Scope of 'Value Added' Approaches

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

"Salvaging Accountability" by Thomas Toch and Douglas N. Harris (Commentary, Oct. 1, 2008) speaks to the faulty premises of the No Child Left Behind Act as a school accountability measure. The chief problem is schools’ responsibility for outcome determinants over which they have no control, including physical, mental, and emotional characteristics, as well as experiential histories.

“Value added” approaches are far more sensible than absolute standards. Those approaches must recognize, however, that student characteristics and experiences are a continuing influence on achievement, rather than being limited to the past. They must be accounted for in value-added programs as well for them to be rational.

Tom Morris
Orlando, Fla.

Vol. 28, Issue 11, Page 27

Related Stories
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login |  Register
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories

Viewed

Emailed

Commented