Published Online: August 25, 2008
Published in Print: August 27, 2008, as Teacher ‘Residencies’ Examined

Report Roundup

Teacher ‘Residencies’ Examined

“Creating and Sustaining Urban Teacher Residencies: A New Way to Recruit, Prepare, and Retain Effective Teachers in High-Needs Districts”

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Evidence suggests that urban teacher “residency” programs are attracting talented and diverse recruits to high-needs schools and helping keep them in those schools, a new reportRequires Adobe Acrobat Reader says.

In urban-teacher residencies, rigorously selected aspiring teachers integrate their master’s level schoolwork with a full year of classroom teaching alongside an experienced mentor. In the second year, they become teachers in their own classrooms while still receiving mentoring.

The report from the Center for Teaching Quality in Hillsborough, N.C., and the Aspen Institute, which is headquartered in Washington, looked closely at two of the nation’s longest-running residency programs, in Chicago and Boston.

Both programs have succeeded in attracting high-quality candidates of color, the report says. For instance, 57 percent of Chicago’s residents and 53 percent of Boston’s residents are members of minority groups.

After three years, 95 percent of Chicago’s residents and 90 percent of Boston’s residents were still teaching.

The report says not enough data on the residencies is available to gauge their effect on student achievement, but that both programs are pursuing efforts to address that issue.

School administrators’ assessments, meanwhile, indicate that residents enter schools well-prepared with skills that enhance their effectiveness.

The residencies cost more upfront than most university-based and alternate pathways to certification, but their benefits can reach well beyond the scope of most teacher-preparation programs, the report argues.

Also, financial data suggest that successful residencies could be cost-effective, because the initial expense of a full-time, paid internship under the supervision of a master teacher can be offset over time by increased retention of novice teachers and increased teaching effectiveness.

The recently reauthorized Higher Education Act calls for funds to support such programs.

Vol. 28, Issue 01, Page 5

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login |  Register
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories

Viewed

Emailed

Commented