Rethinking the Way We Hold Schools Accountable
Test-based accountability for schools has been a centerpiece of state-level education policy for more than a decade, and of national policy in the form of the No Child Left Behind Act since 2002.
This approach uses measures of outcomes—primarily student achievement as determined by test scores—to hold schools accountable for student performance. It differs from political accountability directed toward public officials and from market-based accountability in which schools answer directly to parents.
An important virtue of test-based accountability is that it appeals to three quite different views of what is wrong with American schools. Proponents of standards-based reform hail it as one component of a broader strategy to overcome the fragmented and incoherent nature of the K-12 education system. Others see it as a way to pressure inefficient teachers and school administrators into becoming more productive. Still others embrace it as a tool to address the huge disparities in educational outcomes across groups defined by...
This article is available to subscribers only.
To keep reading this article and more, subscribe now or purchase this article.
Subscribe to Education Week and Save
Get a full year and save up to 45%!
Viewed
Emailed
Recommended
Commented
Sponsored Whitepapers
- Senior Director for Professional Issues
- AACTE, Washington, DC
- Foreign Trainer
- Disney English, China
- Executive Director of Business Resources and Organizational Effectiveness
- ICCSD, Iowa City, IA
- Executive Director of Human Resources
- ICCSD, Iowa City, IA
- Superintendent
- Limestone County Board of Education, Athens, AL


