States Wrestle With How to Evaluate Tutoring
Policy Brief Offers States Guidance on Ways to Design Fair, Accurate Measures.
States must evaluate the effectiveness of the free tutoring being provided to children under the federal No Child Left Behind Act. But a lack of resources might force them to compromise on the rigor of those evaluations, a new report says.
The policy brief outlines factors that states might want to consider in deciding whether providers of “supplemental educational services” are fulfilling their promises to raise student achievement. It acknowledges that states “may face a trade-off” between wanting rigorous evaluations and having the time, money, and staff to conduct them.
Released last week by the Supplemental Educational Services Quality Center, a federally funded project of the American Institutes for Research, based in Washington, the paper aims to guide states through the thorny process...
This article is available to subscribers only.
To keep reading this article and more, subscribe now or purchase this article.
Subscribe to Education Week and Save
Get a full year and save up to 45%!
Viewed
Emailed
Recommended
Commented
Sponsored Whitepapers
- Senior Director for Professional Issues
- AACTE, Washington, DC
- Executive Director of Human Resources
- ICCSD, Iowa City, IA
- Superintendent
- Limestone County Board of Education, Athens, AL
- Administrative Vacancy: Assistant Superintendent of High Schools
- Baltimore County Public Schools, Baltimore County, MD
- Executive Director of Business Resources and Organizational Effectiveness
- ICCSD, Iowa City, IA


