School & District Management

Education Sciences Board Convenes for First Time

By Debra Viadero — February 15, 2005 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The Department of Education convened a new national research advisory board last week that has high hopes of injecting more “science” into the study of schooling.

The 15-member National Board of Education Sciences—made up of prominent researchers, business executives, and school administrators—was established in 2002 when Congress overhauled the department’s educational research functions. The Education Sciences Reform Act abolished the department’s office of educational research and improvement, or OERI, and replaced it with a new Institute of Education Sciences that lawmakers hoped would buffer federally financed educational research from prevailing politics and education fads.

The board’s job is to independently advise the institute’s director, Grover J. “Russ” Whitehurst, on the direction and priorities his agency should set. But at the group’s Feb. 8-9 inaugural meeting here, several members made clear that the Bush administration’s ongoing mission of transforming education into an “evidence-based science” is one they endorse.

Sworn In

The members of the newly constituted National Board for Education Sciences are:

Robert C. Granger (chairman),
the president of the William T. Grant Foundation, based in New York City

R. Philip Handy (vice chairman),
the chairman of the Florida state board of education and a co-chairman of Florida Gov. Jeb Bush’s 2002 re-election campaign

Jon Baron, the executive director of the Washington-based Council for Excellence in Government

Beth Ann Bryan, a former senior adviser to then-U.S. Secretary of Education Rod Paige and now senior education adviser in Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld law firm

Carol D’Amico, the chancellor of Ivy Tech State College-Central Indiana and a former U.S. Education Department assistant secretary for vocational and adult education under President Bush

James R. Davis, the superintendent of the Hattiesburg, Miss., schools

Eric A. Hanushek, a senior fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution

Caroline B. Hoxby, an economics professor at Harvard University

Jerry Lee, the president of WBEB 101 FM in Philadelphia and the founder of the Jerry Lee Center for Criminology at the University of Pennsylvania

Robert I. Lopez, the superintendent and principal of the George I. Sanchez Charter High School in Houston

R. James Milgram, a mathematics professor at Stanford University

Sally E. Shaywitz, a pediatrics professor at the Yale University School of Medicine

Joseph K. Torgesen, a professor of psychology and education at Florida State University in Tallahassee

Herbert J. Walberg, a visiting fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution

SOURCE: Institute of Education Sciences

“I am passionate about converting education into a field where a critical mass of people know the difference between quack medicine and real medicine,” Caroline M. Hoxby, a Harvard University economist whose research focuses on education, told fellow board members.

What worries some outsiders, though, is how the new board will define science. The Bush administration, through its centerpiece No Child Left Behind Act and related reading programs, has put a priority on randomized controlled trials—experiments, in other words, that involve randomly assigning subjects to either a treatment or a control group. Some researchers fear that the new emphasis leaves little room for other forms of research, such as descriptive studies, that might afford a better ground-level view of schools and classrooms.

Of the 14 board members sworn in last week, several are active advocates of randomized experiments. They include Jon Baron, the executive director of the nonpartisan, Washington-based Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy, and Jerry Lee, a Philadelphia radio station owner who supports efforts to step up randomized experiments in the social sciences.

“This board is clearly chosen to send a message that favors researchers who prefer a narrow definition of scientifically based research,” Kenji Hakuta, the dean of the education school at the University of California-Merced and the former head of the old OERI board, said in an e-mail.

Mr. Baron, however, said he sees the board as more balanced than critics do.

“I think it cuts across econometric research to randomized trials and everything in between,” he said.

Other observers said they were heartened that some board members and department officials had also expressed a need to be practical and realistic in their quest for more rigorous education research.

For instance, Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings told board members, “We can’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.”

Presidential Selections

In form, the new board has some differences from its predecessor. It contains a few more researchers—eight as opposed to five on the old OERI board. And several of the scholars on the new board were trained in fields outside education, such as economics and medicine.

Some members also have close ties to the Bush administration. They include two former department officials and a former campaign adviser to Gov. Jeb Bush of Florida, the president’s brother.

Unlike the old board, whose members were appointed by the secretary of education, the new board’s nominees are selected by the president and confirmed by the Senate.

The process was changed, in part, to elevate the board’s status.

But some department officials blamed the new nomination procedures for the two years it took to put a board in place.

C. Kent McGuire, who was the assistant secretary of education in charge of the OERI under President Clinton, said the long wait in convening the board means its members will have some catching up to do to make an imprint on the Institute of Education Sciences. That’s because Mr. Whitehurst, out of necessity, had to set much of the agency’s agenda without a board in place.

“There’s no getting around the fact that some bets have already been placed,” said Mr. McGuire, who is now dean of the school of education at Temple University in Philadelphia.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the February 16, 2005 edition of Education Week as Education Sciences Board Convenes for First Time

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Achievement Webinar
How To Tackle The Biggest Hurdles To Effective Tutoring
Learn how districts overcome the three biggest challenges to implementing high-impact tutoring with fidelity: time, talent, and funding.
Content provided by Saga Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Webinar
Reframing Behavior: Neuroscience-Based Practices for Positive Support
Reframing Behavior helps teachers see the “why” of behavior through a neuroscience lens and provides practices that fit into a school day.
Content provided by Crisis Prevention Institute
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Mathematics Webinar
Math for All: Strategies for Inclusive Instruction and Student Success
Looking for ways to make math matter for all your students? Gain strategies that help them make the connection as well as the grade.
Content provided by NMSI

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

School & District Management Opinion 3 Steps for Culturally Competent Education Outside the Classroom
It’s not just all on teachers; the front office staff has a role to play in making schools more equitable.
Allyson Taylor
5 min read
Workflow, Teamwork, Education concept. Team, people, colleagues in company, organization, administrative community. Corporate work, partnership and study.
Paper Trident/iStock
School & District Management Opinion Why Schools Struggle With Implementation. And How They Can Do Better
Improvement efforts often sputter when the rubber hits the road. But do they have to?
8 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
School & District Management How Principals Use the Lunch Hour to Target Student Apathy
School leaders want to trigger the connection between good food, fun, and rewards.
5 min read
Lunch hour at the St. Michael-Albertville Middle School West in Albertville, Minn.
Students share a laugh together during lunch hour at the St. Michael-Albertville Middle School West in Albertville, Minn.
Courtesy of Lynn Jennissen
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Sponsor
Insights from the 15 Superintendents Shaping the Future
The 2023-2024 school year represents a critical inflection point for K-12 education in the United States. With the expiration of ESSER funds on the horizon and the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into teaching and learning processes, educators and administrators face a unique set of challenges and opportunities.
Content provided by Paper
Headshots of 15 superintendents that Philip Cutler interviewed
Image provided by Paper