Federal

Bennett and the N.E.A.—A War of Words

By Lynn Olson — September 16, 1987 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The war of words between U.S. Secretary of Education William J. Bennett and Mary Hatwood Futrell, president of the National Education Association, has escalated in the past year. Following are selected examples of the barbs traded by the Secretary and the union president in recent months:

Secretary of Education William J. Bennett:

Nov. 21, 1986. Speech to the Fairfax County (Va.) Chamber of Commerce.

Mr. Bennett criticized the N.E.A. and three of the nation’s largest administrator groups for dodging the issue of merit pay in their report on teacher evaluation:

“The national education organizations have once again punted. They have endorsed teacher evaluations as long as they are all positive and have no effect. ... This is ridiculous. In fact, teacher evaluations without rewards for those who are good, and warnings for those who teach poorly, are a pointless exercise that the public ought not to tolerate.”

April 5, 1987. Speech to the Education Writers Association, San Francisco.

Mr. Bennett asserted that “the education-reform movement is being hijacked and held for ransom” by education bureaucrats and special-interest groups, including the N.E.A.

Claims that school reform cannot occur without “lots of money first’’ are “polite extortion,” the Secretary insisted. And he predicted that failure to resist the pressure of special interests “will mean ... the slow death of reform.”

July 2, 1987. Statement released during the NEA convention in Los Angeles.

Mr. Bennett charged that the N.E.A. leadership “has long since lost any legitimacy to speak on behalf of the field of American education.”

“Over the past two decades, the N.E.A. has caused or exacerbated many more problems than it has solved. It has opposed, and continues to oppose, the most obvious and important reforms that serious-minded citizens, elected officials--and teachers--have sought.”

In another statement released the same week, Mr. Bennett said: “American teachers want better schools. Unfortunately, they don’t have an ally in the N.E.A. leadership, who showed once again this week that they are far more interested in playing politics than in working for serious education reforms.”

Sept. 6, 1987. Interview on the NBC-TV show “Meet the Press.”

Mr. Bennett claimed that the “education establishment"--in particular, the NEA--has resisted efforts at accountability in education.

“Although many of the members of the NEA are fine teachers and fine people, the NEA resists change--significant change--wherever it is proposed.”

“Whenever you try to get accountability into the system, the NEA is there to resist.”

The Secretary added that he would be “happy to work with the NEA” when the union shifts its emphasis “to the interests of children, rather than just the self-interest of that organization.”

Mary Hatwood Futrell:

Jan. 30, 1987. Speech to the Holmes Group, Washington, D.C.

Ms. Futrell asserted that--when compared with its “rhetoric about excellence in education"--the Reagan Administration’s proposed education budget was “nothing short of duplicitous.”

“The Reagan regime’s motto has become ‘educate the best, forget the rest.’ And that is why this Administration now seeks to slash the federal funds for education by 30 percent.”

Feb. 15, 1987. Speech to the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, Washington, D.C.

Ms. Futrell said equity and excellence were “under siege” by the Reagan Administration.

“Ronald Reagan has spearheaded the retreat from equity, and his loyal sidekick--William Bennett--has praised that retreat.”

“I wonder what our children think when the Secretary of Education--whose overriding responsibility is to serve as an advocate for this nation’s students--goes before Congress to plead for cuts in the education budget. Secretary Bennett would do well to remember that children have a special knack for spotting hypocrisy ... and the Secretary is giving them extra practice in honing that skill.”

“I have waited more than two years for Secretary of Education William Bennett to show--just once--fidelity to the ideals on which he endlessly lectures the American people. ... I have waited for the Secretary to fulfill the responsibilities of his office by acting positively on behalf of this nation’s children. I now believe it is time to explain to Secretary Bennett why we can’t wait.”

July 2, 1987. Speech to the annual N.E.A. convention in Los Angeles.

Ms. Futrell asserted that in 1986, “the voters of America finally rejected voodoo economics.”

“In 1988 they will reject voodoo education--if we do our part. We have the ability, the opportunity, and the responsibility. In 1988, we will elect an Education President.”

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School Climate & Safety Webinar
There But Not Present: Rethinking Student Engagement
Learn how to recognize the early signs of disengagement and what the behavioral science reveals about which interventions actually work.
Content provided by Frontline Education
Teacher Preparation Webinar What Teacher Education Should Look Like in the Age of AI
Explore the current trends around the use of AI in teacher preparation and continuing education with data from the EdWeek Research Center.
English Learners Webinar How Can School Districts Better Support English Learners With Disabilities?
Join this webinar to hear recent findings from the EdWeek Research Center and discover practical strategies for improvement.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal What a Democratic Congress Could Mean for Trump's K-12 Agenda
They may try to reverse—or at least investigate—the Trump admin.'s efforts to dismantle the Ed. Dept.
9 min read
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., the top Democrat in the Republican-majority House, is joined by Rep. Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., chair of the House Democratic Caucus, as they criticize President Donald Trump and his policies while talking to reporters about the approaching midterm election, at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, Sept. 17, 2026.
House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries speaks at the U.S. Capitol on Sept. 17, 2026. He's joined by Rep. Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., who chairs the House Democratic Caucus. If Democrats gain a majority of either chamber of Congress after next month's elections, they'll be able to hold oversight hearings on and launch investigations into the dismantling of the U.S. Department of Education.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Federal The Future of Education Research: More Partisan and Largely Left to States?
As Trump administration works to change federal grants, outside researchers try to regroup.
6 min read
Image of file folders with tabs called "funding" "grants" "projects" and a blank note paper paperclipped to the outside.
Collage by Laura Baker/Education Week + Getty
Federal Bipartisan Bill in Congress Would Help Schools Put Cellphone Bans or Restrictions in Place
The bill would establish a federal grant program to support state efforts to restrict cellphones.
5 min read
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, center, is joined from left by Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., the GOP whip, and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., as he speaks to reporters ahead of a Wednesday meeting with President Donald Trump, at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, June 23, 2026. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., speaks to reporters at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, June 23, 2026.
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., speaks to reporters ahead of a meeting with President Donald Trump at the Capitol in Washington on June 23, 2026. Cotton is one of the sponsors of a bipartisan bill that would create a grant program for states to implement school cellphone bans or restrictions.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Federal Opinion Public Educators Are Skeptical of the New Federal Tax Credits. They Needn't Be
Unlike vouchers, the new scholarships can benefit students choosing to attend public schools.
Deborah A. Gist & Thomas Arnett
•
5 min read
Giant tax funnel drops money into a public school building. Federal tax scholarships, public schools, private schools, charter schools
Vanessa Solis/Education Week + Getty