Rural Students Less Likely to Take Core Sciences in High School, Report Says

By Liana Loewus — June 04, 2014 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

By guest blogger Jackie Mader.

This post originally appeared in a longer form on the Rural Education blog.

Students who graduate from rural schools are less likely than their non-rural peers to have completed a biology, chemistry, and physics course in high school, according to a new federal report.

The National Center for Education Statistics released “The Condition of Education” on Wednesday, an annual report that examines more than 40 aspects of education in the nation, including enrollment characteristics, school populations, and postsecondary education costs. Unlike 2013, this year’s report did not include a chapter solely on rural education, but it does compare several data points from rural schools to urban and suburban schools.

The report found that, overall, the percentage of high school graduates who have completed certain math and science courses in high school increased between 1990 and 2009. But a disparity exists between rural students and their nonrural peers. In 2009, only 20 percent of graduates from rural areas had taken courses in biology, chemistry, and physics in high school, compared to 32 percent of graduates in city schools and 39 percent in suburban schools.

Some research has found that rural science teachers are less likely than urban science teachers to have majored in science or have a graduate degree in science. That means they may have taken fewer math and science courses than science teachers in urban areas. Many rural schools struggle to attract and retain science teachers, which may mean they are unable to offer certain courses.

Related Tags:

A version of this news article first appeared in the Curriculum Matters blog.