Standards Opinion

Common Core: Lessons Learned in Kentucky

By Stu Silberman — December 18, 2012 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Following is a guest post from Kentucky’s Commissioner of Education, Terry Holliday.

Kentucky has a tradition as a leader in education reform. For years, 1990’s Kentucky Education Reform Act served as a model for curriculum, school
governance and finance nationwide.

In 2009, the Kentucky General Assembly mapped the course for the state’s latest reform efforts when it passed legislation known as Senate Bill 1. It called for the adoption of new, more rigorous and college/career-aligned academic
standards along with a new assessment and accountability system based on those standards. The goal was to ensure more students are ready for postsecondary
education or the workplace and that they are successful.

With that charge, Kentucky became the first state to adopt, implement and test the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) in English/language arts and mathematics. This presented both a
challenge and an opportunity -- an opportunity to lead and the challenge to do so without the benefit of others’ insight and experience.

Thanks to strategic planning; dedicated educators, partners and staff to carry out those plans; and a shared desire for all students to graduate from high
school college/career-ready, this work has proceeded smoothly despite the potential for major problems. As other states move forward with the
implementation and testing of CCSS, I’d like to share some of the lessons Kentucky has learned:

1. Communicate, communicate, communicate. It’s important from the start that every stakeholder knows what’s changing, why and what the end results will be.
That information must be shared early and often. Doing so in Kentucky ensured everyone was kept abreast of revisions and next steps. It also helped
establish the Kentucky Department of Education (KDE) as a trusted information source in the midst of major change.

2. Partner support is vital. KDE teamed with professional associations (school administrators, superintendents, teachers, school boards), the state PTA, Prichard Committee for Academic Excellence, education
cooperatives and the Kentucky Chamber of Commerce to solicit widespread grassroots support and understanding among
their respective constituents.

3. Start with teachers. They need to be involved every step of the way. To build capacity for implementing the common core, Kentucky created regional Leadership Networks comprised of content
specialists in English/language arts and mathematics from each grade level in every district. More than 1,400 Kentucky educators worked to break down the
standards into learning targets, focus on assessment literacy and the characteristics effective teaching and learning. This process resulted in not only a
deeper understanding of the standards but also and how instructional practice needed to change -- insights these teachers could share with those in their
districts. Instructional support and administrator leadership networks rounded out the team approach to implementation in each district.

4. Business support. The business community in
Kentucky has a long history of supporting education reform. College and career readiness is no different, and in many ways answered long-held concerns
business leaders had been raising with educators. Recognizing how vital a partner the business community is, we knew it was important to keep the members
informed of the changes schools were undertaking and the reasons behind them. To that end, the president of the Kentucky Chamber of Commerce and I toured the state to speak to
business and community organizations to build support, explain Senate Bill 1 and how the changes were necessary to grow the state’s economy and secure its
place in the global marketplace.

5. Stay ahead of potential pitfalls. In Kentucky, we anticipated that student achievement levels would drop significantly under the new assessment system
due to the rigor of the new standards and learning gaps that would exist between the old and new standards. In fact, levels did drop but, thankfully, not
as much as projected. By warning teachers, principals,
superintendents, the media and parents that this would happen, there was less pushback on the new standards than we might have received otherwise.

6. Focus on continuous improvement. This was the reason Kentucky applied for and was granted flexibility on Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)
requirements. We believed continuous growth and improvement for all our students, as well as all teachers and principals, was necessary if we were to reach
our goals of every child becoming proficient and prepared for success -- and all students being college/career-ready when they graduate from high school.
It’s hard to argue with promoting academic growth for all children.

7. Be open-minded to changes. With massive and comprehensive reform, it’s difficult to anticipate every issue and get everything perfect right out of the
starting gate, hard as everyone may try. Once the first data comes back,

dissect and study it

. Look for anomalies, and be willing to tweak the system to eliminate those issues the next time.

8. It helps to have legislative backing. In Kentucky, it was the General Assembly that set the vision and mandated changes. The legislation directed the
Kentucky Department of Education, Council on Postsecondary Education and Education Professional Standards Board to work together to develop and carry out a comprehensive, systemic plan to
improve student outcomes from early childhood through college. Our mission was clear.

The opinions expressed in Public Engagement & Ed Reform are strictly those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Editorial Projects in Education, or any of its publications.

Commenting has been disabled on edweek.org effective Sept. 8. Please visit our FAQ section for more details. To get in touch with us visit our contact page, follow us on social media, or submit a Letter to the Editor.


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Teaching Webinar
6 Key Trends in Teaching and Learning
As we enter the third school year affected by the pandemic—and a return to the classroom for many—we come better prepared, but questions remain. How will the last year impact teaching and learning this school
Content provided by Instructure
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
School & District Management Webinar
Ensuring Continuity of Learning: How to Prepare for the Next Disruption
Across the country, K-12 schools and districts are, again, considering how to ensure effective continuity of learning in the face of emerging COVID variants, politicized debates, and more. Learn from Alexandria City Public Schools superintendent
Content provided by Class
Teaching Profession Live Online Discussion What Have We Learned From Teachers During the Pandemic?
University of California, Santa Cruz, researcher Lora Bartlett and her colleagues spent months studying how the pandemic affected classroom teachers. We will discuss the takeaways from her research not only for teachers, but also for

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Standards Opinion How the Failure of the Common Core Looked From the Ground
Steve Peha shares insights from his on-site professional-development work about why the common core failed, in a guest letter to Rick Hess.
4 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Standards Opinion Common Core Is a Meal Kit, Not a Nothingburger
Caroline Damon argues Rick Hess and Tom Loveless sold the common core short, claiming the issue was a matter of high-quality implementation.
5 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Standards How New Common Core Research Connects to Biden's Plans for Children and Families
A study of national test scores indicate the early phase of the Common Core State Standards did not help disadvantaged students.
5 min read
results 925693186 02
Standards Opinion After All That Commotion, Was the Common Core a Big Nothingburger?
The Common Core State Standards may not have had an impact on student outcomes, but they did make school improvement tougher and more ideological.
3 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty