Federal

Federal Changes Could Boost School-Run Radio Stations

By Andrew Trotter — December 07, 2007 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Low-power FM radio, which some schools use to connect with their communities and give students hands-on experience in the medium, is getting renewed backing from federal regulators.

Late last month, the Federal Communications Commission adopted several rules and proposed others that it could use to add to the 817 low-power FM licenses now held by such nonprofit organizations as schools, universities, churches, and museums.

Separately, bills in Congress would also ease restrictions that have limited the availability of low-power FM licenses.

As the name implies, low-power FM broadcasting uses the same part of the radio spectrum that “full-service” FM stations use, but with much lower power—from 10 to 100 watts—limiting the broadcast radius to about 10 miles or significantly less, depending on the terrain. The small scale allows use of an inexpensive transmitter and a small antenna, which a school typically places on its roof or flagpole.

That scale is well suited to schools and other community groups that have been awarded the free licenses. Low-power FM stations offer music, news, public-affairs, and sports programming, as well as public-service announcements and emergency notices—usually with a distinctly local flair. (“Voice of Ouray,” June 22, 2005.)

“High schools have done excellent work with low-power FM stations,” said Hannah Sassaman, the program director of the Prometheus Radio Project, a nonprofit group based in Philadelphia that assists the small stations and lobbies in Washington for low-power FM.

She said there is a “huge pent-up demand” for licenses, including 2,400 applications pending before the FCC since 2000.

The nation’s full-service broadcasters, including both commercial and public radio stations, have long fought to restrict the license class, arguing that the signals, if allowed into the tightly packed FM band, would interfere with their broadcasts.

Congress responded in 2000 by curtailing the issuing of low-power FM licenses in most of the nation’s populous areas.

Interference at Issue

FCC Chairman Kevin J. Martin said in a statement the proposed rules would “better promote entry [of new broadcasters] and ensure local responsiveness without harming the interests of full-power FM stations.”

Still, the National Association of Broadcasters, which represents 7,000 radio and TV broadcasters, reiterated its concern about interference after the FCC’s action.

Dennis Wharton, a spokesman for the Washington-based NAB, dismissed a two-year, $2 million federal study that in 2003 found that the interference by low-power FM stations was likely to be minimal. “Interference on the radio dial is real,” he said.

The FCC did resolve some of the large broadcasters’ concerns by clarifying that low-power FM stations must be locally owned with locally originated programming and with ownership limited to one station per license, an NAB statement said.

But the FCC tentatively concluded that when a full-service station takes over the bandwidth of a low-power station, the former must help the latter move to a new spot on the dial.

The agency also tentatively concluded that the low-power stations should be able to take broadcast frequencies closer to those of neighboring stations, if there is no evidence of interference. Such a recommendation would have to be enacted by Congress, though.

The FCC rules, issued Nov. 27, also aim to prevent local low-power FM stations from being displaced by “translator” stations, which repeat programming that originated farther away using the same bandwidth as the low-power stations.

The full details of the FCC action have not been released but are expected soon.

Related Tags:

Events

School Climate & Safety K-12 Essentials Forum Strengthen Students’ Connections to School
Join this free event to learn how schools are creating the space for students to form strong bonds with each other and trusted adults.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
IT Infrastructure & Management Webinar
Future-Proofing Your School's Tech Ecosystem: Strategies for Asset Tracking, Sustainability, and Budget Optimization
Gain actionable insights into effective asset management, budget optimization, and sustainable IT practices.
Content provided by Follett Learning
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Budget & Finance Webinar
Innovative Funding Models: A Deep Dive into Public-Private Partnerships
Discover how innovative funding models drive educational projects forward. Join us for insights into effective PPP implementation.
Content provided by Follett Learning

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal K-12 Leaders Denounce Antisemitism But Reject That It's Rampant in Schools
Three school district leaders said they're committed to rooting out antisemitism during a hearing in Congress.
6 min read
From left, David Banks, chancellor of New York Public schools, speaks next to Karla Silvestre, President of the Montgomery Count (Md.) Board of Education, Emerson Sykes, Staff Attorney with the ACLU, and Enikia Ford Morthel, Superintendent of the Berkeley United School District, during a hearing on antisemitism in K-12 public schools, at the House Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education, on May 8, 2024, on Capitol Hill in Washington.
From left, David Banks, chancellor of New York City schools, speaks next to Karla Silvestre, president of the Montgomery County, Md., school board; Emerson Sykes, staff attorney with the ACLU; and Enikia Ford Morthel, superintendent of the Berkeley Unified school district in Berkeley, Calif., during a hearing on antisemitism in K-12 public schools, at the House Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education, on May 8, 2024, in Washington.
Jacquelyn Martin/AP
Federal Miguel Cardona in the Hot Seat: 4 Takeaways From a Contentious House Hearing
FAFSA, rising antisemitism, and Title IX dominated questioning at a U.S. House hearing with Education Secretary Miguel Cardona.
6 min read
Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona testifies during a House Committee on Education and Workforce hearing on Capitol Hill, Tuesday, May 7, 2024, in Washington.
U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona testifies during a House Committee on Education and Workforce hearing on Capitol Hill on May 7 in Washington.
Mariam Zuhaib/AP
Federal Arming Teachers Could Cause 'Accidents and More Tragedy,' Miguel Cardona Says
"This is not in my opinion a smart option,” the education secretary said at an EdWeek event.
4 min read
U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona speaks during Education Week’s 2024 Leadership Symposium at the Hyatt Regency Crystal City in Arlington, Va., on May 2, 2024.
U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona speaks during Education Week’s 2024 Leadership Symposium at the Hyatt Regency Crystal City in Arlington, Va., on May 2, 2024.
Sam Mallon/Education Week
Federal Opinion Should Migrant Families Pay Tuition for Public School?
The answer must reflect an outlook that is pro-immigration, pro-compassion, and pro-law and order, writes Michael J. Petrilli.
Michael J. Petrilli
4 min read
Image of a pencil holder filled with a variety of colored pencils that match the background with international flags.
Laura Baker/Education Week via Canva