Education Funding

Alabama OKs Bond Sale to Dull Pain Of Education Cuts

By Erik W. Robelen — May 30, 2001 5 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Alabama’s governor sought last week to soften the blow of midyear education spending cuts by signing a bill that lets the state borrow up to $110 million.

Gov. Donald Siegelman praised the legislature for taking action on the plan, which he said would help schools and universities “at a time when they critically need it.”

That need arose after the Democratic governor announced in February that, because of a shortfall in tax revenues, the state’s $4.3 billion education budget for the current fiscal year would have to be reduced by about 6 percent.

But Lt. Gov. Steve Windom, a Republican, is among those who view the plan as both shortsighted and wrongheaded, said his spokesman, Ragan Ingram.

“We feel like this was probably the most irresponsible fiscal action in the history of the state,” Mr. Ingram said. “The governor has taken out a $110 million mortgage to pay off the light bill.”

Under the new law, the state could issue bonds of up to $110 million, to be repaid over the next 20 years through money from the state’s Education Trust Fund. With interest, Mr. Ingram said, the cost could be as high as $200 million, though the governor’s office has estimated it would be about $180 million.

The legislation is aimed at relieving some of the pain from the $266 million in spending cuts for this year that kicked in when tax revenues fell short, under a process that state officials call proration. The Education Trust Fund is fed by state sales- and income-tax revenues.

Gov. Siegelman’s approach to proration has weighed more heavily on the state’s universities and two-year colleges than on K-12 schools, largely because precollegiate salaries were excluded from the cuts. Higher education institutions have seen decreases of about 11 percent, while school district budgets have been trimmed by nearly 4 percent.

Disputes over the governor’s approach have led to legal action pitting precollegiate and higher education representatives against one another. A case is now before the Alabama Supreme Court. (“In Ala. Budget Crisis, It’s Schools vs. Colleges,” March 7, 2001.)

Cushioning the Blow

Under the new law, the distribution of the state bond funds would vary, depending on which side loses in court.

The measure, which the governor signed into law on May 25, is designed to make sure that both education sectors effectively lose 3.76 percent of their funding for the current fiscal year—the amount that the public schools are currently losing under the governor’s plan.

That means that if the supreme court upholds Gov. Siegelman’s approach, higher education institutions would receive roughly $80 million from the bond-sale proceeds, and K-12 schools would get no extra aid, according to an analysis by the Alabama Association of School Boards. If the court orders an across-the-board cut of 6.2 percent, the schools would receive $68 million and universities would receive $27 million, the association said. The plan allows up to $110 million in bond authority in case revenues fall further below projections and further cuts are required.

The money could be used to pay off debts or cover capital expenses, such as construction or equipment purchases. While state law does not allow bonds to cover operating costs, such as salaries or utility bills, some supporters suggest that other funds could be freed up for those purposes.

The school bond legislation has drawn a mixed response within the state’s education community. For example, a coalition of the state’s four-year public universities came out strongly against it.

“This sends the message that, “Oh, we don’t really have a problem; we can just sell another bond,’ ” said A. Gordon Stone, the executive director of the Higher Education Partnership.

Even those who backed the plan did so with some reluctance.

“It’s bad public policy, but it was something that was desperately needed at this time,” said Paul R. Hubbert, the executive secretary of the Alabama Education Association, an affiliate of the National Education Association.

“It’s a Band-Aid, and we’re going to pay for that Band- Aid for 20 years,” said Sandra Sims deGraffenreid, the executive director of the Alabama Association of School Boards, which did not take an official position on the bond bill.

Meanwhile, the legislature has approved a $4.1 billion education budget for the coming fiscal year. The spending plan, which the governor signed on May 21, is lower than the original budget for the current year, but about $100 million more than that budget after the $266 million cuts were imposed.

The legislature also has stipulated that a three- member panel, composed of the state finance director and the chairmen of the committees that oversee the education budget in the House and the Senate, would have the authority to cut next year’s budget by 1 percent by Aug. 31 if tax revenues are falling short.

John C. Draper, the executive director of the Council for Leaders in Alabama Schools, which represents school administrators, said that while the bond issue will be helpful, it does not address what he believes to be a flawed tax system in the state. He argues that the heavy reliance on sales and income taxes to pay for education is risky.

“The slightest souring of the economy impacts schools immediately and tremendously,” he said.

Meanwhile, in Mobile County, where the school system has felt hard- pressed by the state’s fiscal troubles, the public schools will see an increase in their budget after local taxpayers voted this month to raise taxes. Stephen E. Pryor, a spokesman for the 65,000-student district, said the state budget cuts were an important factor in building support for the local tax hikes.

In response to the state cuts, district Superintendent Harold W. Dodge had declared earlier this year that Mobile County would have to cut such programs as the high school band and the football program. With the new money, though, the district is not planning such drastic measures.

While some parts of the county will see only property-tax increases, the cities of Pritchard and Mobile opted to combine a smaller property-tax increase with a slight sales-tax increase. Repeated attempts in previous years to enact such tax hikes have been rejected by voters.

The district, Mr. Pryor said, “really has not been funded adequately at the local level for many years.”

A version of this article appeared in the May 30, 2001 edition of Education Week as Alabama OKs Bond Sale to Dull Pain Of Education Cuts

Events

Federal Webinar The Trump Budget and Schools: Subscriber Exclusive Quick Hit
EdWeek subscribers, join this 30-minute webinar to find out what the latest federal policy changes mean for K-12 education.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Curriculum Webinar
End Student Boredom: K-12 Publisher's Guide to 70% Engagement Boost
Calling all K-12 Publishers! Student engagement flatlining? Learn how to boost it by up to 70%.
Content provided by KITABOO
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management
Moving the Needle on Attendance: What’s Working NOW
See how family engagement is improving attendance, and how to put it to work in schools.
Content provided by TalkingPoints

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Funding Trump's Cancellation of States' COVID-Relief Funding Is on Hold Again
Pandemic-relief funds in 16 states have been temporarily restored—again—just days before they were set to expire.
3 min read
3d Render Red glossy Glass Dollar Sign icon in circle Blue Soft Maze, problems, solutions, strategy concept
iStock/Getty
Education Funding How Trump’s School Priorities Will Shape New Ed. Dept. Grants
The Department of Education on Tuesday announced the priorities it will use to award competitive grants.
6 min read
High school student teachers read a book to a preschool class.
High school student teachers read a book to a preschool class. Evidence-based literacy instruction will be one priority for the Trump administration as it awards competitive education grants. The priorities in those competitions will be school choice and "returning education to the states."
Allison Shelley for All4Ed
Education Funding Education Department Adds $60 Million in Grants for Charter Schools
The department will free up the funding after it gained more spending leeway in a March budget bill.
5 min read
From the left, kindergarteners Kiera Lee, Jenny Sun, Gilbert Li, and Avelyn Fong, wait in line to walk the red carpet while listening to music from Beauty and the Beast, on the first day of school, at the Philadelphia Performing Arts Charter School, K to 1, on South Broad Street, in Philadelphia on Sept. 9, 2019.
Students wait in line on the first day of school at the Philadelphia Performing Arts Charter School in Philadelphia on Sept. 9, 2019. The Trump administration has increased funding for charter school grants by $60 million.
Jessica Griffin/The Philadelphia Inquirer via AP
Education Funding Kennedy Assures Congress Funding for Head Start Will Not Be Cut
Kennedy said the administration would “emphasize healthy eating in Head Start."
1 min read
Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. appears before a Senate committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions hearing at the U.S. Capitol on May 14, 2025, in Washington.
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. appears before the Senate's Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions committee at the U.S. Capitol on May 14, 2025. The secretary told lawmakers the Trump administration wouldn't cut funding for Head Start after an early budget draft proposed eliminating the early childhood program for children from low-income families.
John McDonnell/AP