Opinion
Education Opinion

Performance-Pay Innovation

By Walt Gardner — May 07, 2014 1 min read

Until recently, performance pay essentially meant offering teachers more money based largely on their students’ standardized test scores. But if the recent contract in New York City is ratified by union members, this would change. Teachers chosen by principals from a list prepared by committees of union and Education Department representatives will get anywhere from $7,500 to $20,000 more a year, depending on their designation of either “model” or “master” teacher (“Teachers Question Pay-for-Performance Element in Proposed Contract,” The New York Times, May 3).

To receive the bonuses, teachers who are selected must work up to four additional hours a month and up to three more days in the summer. They would also have to open their classrooms to observations by other teachers. Master teachers would have to swap schools for one year with other master teachers. This model expands on ones already in existence in 78 schools.

Unlike past bonus-pay programs, which were tainted by favoritism and ultracompetitiveness, the present program is promising because it minimizes or eliminates both factors: Teachers are not unilaterally chosen by the principal, and colleagueship is maintained because not all outstanding teachers want the additional responsibility. Moreover, the program offers teachers an incentive to stay in the classroom - rather than become administrators- to increase their income.

I don’t think we can continue along the same path paying all teachers the same. As in any profession, some are better than others. The challenge is to identify who these teachers are in a fair and transparent manner. If this is done properly, I support the change.

The opinions expressed in Walt Gardner’s Reality Check are strictly those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Editorial Projects in Education, or any of its publications.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Future of Work Webinar
Digital Literacy Strategies to Promote Equity
Our new world has only increased our students’ dependence on technology. This makes digital literacy no longer a “nice to have” but a “need to have.” How do we ensure that every student can navigate
Content provided by Learning.com
Mathematics Online Summit Teaching Math in a Pandemic
Attend this online summit to ask questions about how COVID-19 has affected achievement, instruction, assessment, and engagement in math.
School & District Management Webinar Examining the Evidence: Catching Kids Up at a Distance
As districts, schools, and families navigate a new normal following the abrupt end of in-person schooling this spring, students’ learning opportunities vary enormously across the nation. Access to devices and broadband internet and a secure

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Speech Therapists
Lancaster, PA, US
Lancaster Lebanon IU 13
Elementary Teacher
Madison, Wisconsin
One City Schools

Read Next

Education Obituary In Memory of Michele Molnar, EdWeek Market Brief Writer and Editor
EdWeek Market Brief Associate Editor Michele Molnar, who was instrumental in launching the publication, succumbed to cancer.
5 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: December 9, 2020
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: Stories You May Have Missed
A collection of articles from the previous week that you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: Stories You May Have Missed
A collection of stories from the previous week that you may have missed.
8 min read