Those who have readLearning Forward’s Standards for Professional Learning realize that not all professional learning is created equal. In terms of the Learning Designs standard, that means that not all professional learning is designed appropriately, and not all professional learning achieves its intended results.
Establishing clarity about the intended outcomes for professional learning must precede the selection of the learning design to ensure proper planning, implementation, follow-up support, and evaluation. A common framework for explaining intended outcomes is KASAB, which stands for knowledge, attitudes, skills, aspiration, and behaviors are strategies that are appropriate for developing awareness (Knowledge); changing minds (Attitudes); developing expertise (Skills); inspiring action (Aspiration); or instilling routines (Behaviors).
It is irresponsible for a leader to hold individuals accountable for particular results after selecting the wrong learning design for achieving them. Let’s say a school system adopts a new math program at the elementary level. After several months engaging teachers in examining various options, adopting a new philosophy about math instruction, purchasing new technology and manipulatives, the district is ready to launch the initiative. District staff convenes all elementary teachers in a large auditorium to provide a half-day introduction to the new math curriculum. At the end of the day, the district curriculum director announces that evaluators will assess teachers’ progress in using the curriculum during the first six weeks. The district has no other plans for ongoing support.
I could save the district the expense and effort of sending out evaluators at the end of six weeks. According to research from Bruce Joyce and Beverly Showers, the district should expect to hear that about 10 percent of teachers are mastering the new curriculum. Show-and-tell teaching is not an effective design for promoting the development of KASAB. While the district invested considerable time thinking about its outcomes, it failed to select appropriate learning designs to achieve them.
Designing effective professional learning combines sophisticated understanding of adult learning theories, research, and models of human learning. There are several key factors to keep in mind when selecting and designing learning. Educator learning should replicate student learning. In other words, if principals are learning how to lead learning teams, the experience should occur within learning teams. If teachers are learning how to implement problem-based learning strategies, they should learn it by experiencing problem-based learning. The goals we want for students must be included in the designs we create for the adults.
Powerful learning strategies include active engagement, modeling, reflection, metacognition, application, feedback, ongoing support, assessment, and more. It occurs in formal, informal, and hybrid learning settings and is organized for individuals, teams, and schoolwide groups. Some learning occurs during the workday, other learning occurs after school, in evenings, and during the summer.
We know educators’ time is precious and resources are tight. We have a tremendous responsibility to ensure professional learning is beneficial, meets educators’ goals, and leads to its intended results for students. Educators and students have no time to spare.
As I recently heard the superintendent from Springfield, Mass., say to a group of thoughtful educators, “Hope is not a strategy.” The intentional identification of learning designs is one critical step for those truly committed to better results for adults and students.
Executive Director, Learning Forward
The opinions expressed in Learning Forward’s PD Watch are strictly those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Editorial Projects in Education, or any of its publications.