Education Opinion

How Free and Open Technologies Benefit the Affluent

By Justin Reich — June 01, 2012 1 min read

My friends at the Berkman Center finished editing the recording of a talk I gave in March at the Hewlett Grantee Meeting. The talk, “When Open Encounters Different Classrooms,” is built around a simple premise: in places with profoundly inequitable school systems, our conceptual models of technology-enhanced education systems always need to account for these inequalities.

Many folks, when imagining the world of education technology, have a conceptual framework including three archetypal actors: designers, educators and learners. Designers build stuff (resources, tools, games, platforms, videos, etc.) and put them on the Internet. This stuff then makes its way into learner brains, either directly or via educators as intermediaries.

What I recommend, is that we envision two sets of educators and learners on the far side of the Internet: one set in affluent schools and one set in low-income schools. Then, we should think about how our stuff—our resources, our games, our designs, and our research—impact learners differently in these different settings. I think there is a tremendous risk right now that most of our efforts around technology-enhanced learning, even things which are freely accessible, will disproportionately benefit the already advantaged. I explain that risk more fully in the presentation. I’ve been trying to share this message in a number of forums over the last year, and I’m starting to feel like it’s gaining some traction among foundations and policymakers.

Here’s the full talk, after about 2 minutes of introduction, the talk goes for about 15 minutes. Enjoy, and comments always welcome.

For regular updates, follow me on Twitter at @bjfr and for my papers, presentations and so forth, visit EdTechResearcher.

The opinions expressed in EdTech Researcher are strictly those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Editorial Projects in Education, or any of its publications.

Let us know what you think!

We’re looking for feedback on our new site to make sure we continue to provide you the best experience.


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Future of Work Webinar
Digital Literacy Strategies to Promote Equity
Our new world has only increased our students’ dependence on technology. This makes digital literacy no longer a “nice to have” but a “need to have.” How do we ensure that every student can navigate
Content provided by Learning.com
Mathematics Online Summit Teaching Math in a Pandemic
Attend this online summit to ask questions about how COVID-19 has affected achievement, instruction, assessment, and engagement in math.
School & District Management Webinar Examining the Evidence: Catching Kids Up at a Distance
As districts, schools, and families navigate a new normal following the abrupt end of in-person schooling this spring, students’ learning opportunities vary enormously across the nation. Access to devices and broadband internet and a secure

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Speech Therapists
Lancaster, PA, US
Lancaster Lebanon IU 13
Elementary Teacher
Madison, Wisconsin
One City Schools
Elementary Teacher - Scholars Academy
Madison, Wisconsin
One City Schools

Read Next

Education Obituary In Memory of Michele Molnar, EdWeek Market Brief Writer and Editor
EdWeek Market Brief Associate Editor Michele Molnar, who was instrumental in launching the publication, succumbed to cancer.
5 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: December 9, 2020
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: Stories You May Have Missed
A collection of articles from the previous week that you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: Stories You May Have Missed
A collection of stories from the previous week that you may have missed.
8 min read