Opinion
Education Opinion

Competing on an Unequal Footing

By Walt Gardner — September 06, 2013 1 min read

Reformers like to cite the success of choice schools as evidence of their superiority over traditional public schools. As readers of this column know, I support parental choice. But I’ve repeatedly emphasized that there are unavoidable costs associated with the strategy.

A compelling example comes from Wisconsin, where Disability Rights Wisconsin and the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit against the state alleging that “voucher schools tend not to admit or accommodate students with disabilities” (“In some choice schools, disabilities are liability,” wisconsinwatch.org, Jul. 7).

It’s important to remember that although choice schools cannot refuse to enroll a student on the basis of a disability, they have no legal responsibility to meet the student’s special needs. As a result, traditional public schools become the schools of last resort. They also are the schools that students attend when their parents are not involved in their education. In other words, choice is not a panacea. It will always leave collateral damage in one way or another.

The usual rebuttal is that this is unfortunate, but it is the price we have to pay to improve the education for students who are poorly served by the status quo. I wonder, however, if those who take this position realize the implications. There’s no question that choice helps some students who are trapped in chronically failing schools. But what about students whose parents do not take advantage of the options open to them? Do we write them off? Apparently so. The social justice argument is simply ignored. I have never heard a satisfactory explanation why.

The free market that Milton Friedman advocated in 1955 with the release of “The Role of Government in Education” will appeal to ideologues, but I do not believe it will produce the results that many believe.

The opinions expressed in Walt Gardner’s Reality Check are strictly those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Editorial Projects in Education, or any of its publications.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Future of Work Webinar
Digital Literacy Strategies to Promote Equity
Our new world has only increased our students’ dependence on technology. This makes digital literacy no longer a “nice to have” but a “need to have.” How do we ensure that every student can navigate
Content provided by Learning.com
Mathematics Online Summit Teaching Math in a Pandemic
Attend this online summit to ask questions about how COVID-19 has affected achievement, instruction, assessment, and engagement in math.
School & District Management Webinar Examining the Evidence: Catching Kids Up at a Distance
As districts, schools, and families navigate a new normal following the abrupt end of in-person schooling this spring, students’ learning opportunities vary enormously across the nation. Access to devices and broadband internet and a secure

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Speech Therapists
Lancaster, PA, US
Lancaster Lebanon IU 13
Elementary Teacher
Madison, Wisconsin
One City Schools

Read Next

Education Obituary In Memory of Michele Molnar, EdWeek Market Brief Writer and Editor
EdWeek Market Brief Associate Editor Michele Molnar, who was instrumental in launching the publication, succumbed to cancer.
5 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: December 9, 2020
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: Stories You May Have Missed
A collection of articles from the previous week that you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: Stories You May Have Missed
A collection of stories from the previous week that you may have missed.
8 min read