Law & Courts

Pa. ‘Boobies’ Case to Be Heard by Full Appeals Court

By J.D. Malone, The Morning Call, Pa. (MCT) — August 16, 2012 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The Easton Area School District’s appeal of a federal court ruling to allow “I (heart) Boobies” bracelets to be worn by students at school will heard by the entire Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

A three-judge panel from the circuit heard arguments in April on the appeal, but an order issued Thursday by Chief Judge Theodore McKee brushed aside the panel’s unpublished opinion and set up a rehearing of the case before the full, 14-judge circuit.

The Easton Area School District asked for a reversal of a lower court’s April 2011 decision that barred the district from disciplining students who wore the bracelets.

The case drew national attention as schools grappled with similar questions over the bracelets, which are sold by the Carlsbad, Calif.-based Keep-a-Breast Foundation. In February, a federal judge in Wisconsin ruled that school officials were allowed to ban the bracelets, opposite to U.S. District Judge Mary A. McLaughlin’s finding in the Easton Area case.

Easton Area Middle School students Brianna Hawk, who was an eighth-grader, and Kayla Martinez, who was in seventh grade, were suspended in 2010 for wearing “I (heart) Boobies!” bracelets.

The students’ attorney, Mary Catherine Roper, of the ACLU, said the court’s decision to hear the case before the full host of judges means there was some disagreement over the three-judge panel’s opinion.

The panel’s opinions are circulated among the circuit’s judges, Roper said, who vote to agree or disagree with it. She said more than half must disagree to push the case in front of the entire circuit, or en banc.

“You never expect an en banc hearing,” Roper said. “What it means is, there is disagreement among the judges.”

John Freund, the school district’s attorney, was not immediately available for comment.

Roper said the court will review the case and may order new briefs from attorneys, but cannot take new testimony or evidence. The court may also choose to hear oral argument, but does not have to. Roper expects the court to ask for argument though.

The lower court’s ruling allowing the bracelets stands until a higher court overrules it.

“We still have that win,” Roper said. “The bracelets are still allowed in the school right now, and that will be the situation until the court says something else.”

Copyright (c) 2012, The Morning Call, Pa. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Unlocking Success for Struggling Adolescent Readers
The Science of Reading transformed K-3 literacy. Now it's time to extend that focus to students in grades 6 through 12.
Content provided by STARI
Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and K-12 education jubs at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Artificial Intelligence Webinar
MTSS + AI in Action: Reimagining Student Support
See how one district is using AI to strengthen MTSS, reduce workload, and improve student support.
Content provided by Panorama Education

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Supreme Court Seems Poised to Reject Trump's Birthright Order
Trump’s attendance in the birthright citizenship case marked the first time a sitting president has done this.
6 min read
President Donald Trump leaves the Supreme Court, on April 1, 2026, in Washington.
President Donald Trump leaves the Supreme Court on April 1, 2026, in Washington. The justices signaled skepticism of Trump’s bid to restrict birthright citizenship.
Anthony Peltier/AP
Law & Courts Birthright Citizenship Case Raises Stakes for Schools and Undocumented Students
Educators are paying close attention to the case on Trump's birthright citizenship order.
10 min read
President Donald Trump signs an executive order on birthright citizenship in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, Jan. 20, 2025.
President Donald Trump signs an executive order on birthright citizenship in the Oval Office of the White House on Jan. 20, 2025. The order, now before the U.S. Supreme Court, seeks to limit citizenship for some children born in the United States to immigrant parents without permanent legal status.
Evan Vucci/AP
Law & Courts Appeals Court Revives Lawsuit Over 1st Grader’s Black Lives Matter Drawing
A court revived a 1st grader 's claim she was punished for giving a drawing to a Black classmate.
4 min read
Seen is the drawing made by Viejo Elementary School first-grader B.B. that was entered into evidence. B.B. gave the drawing to her classmate, M.C., who is African American. M.C. thanked B.B.
Pictured is a drawing by a 1st grader in California and given to a Black classmate that is at the center of a First Amendment legal challenge over the student's alleged punishment.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
Law & Courts Supreme Court’s Gender Identity Ruling Leaves Schools Seeking Clarity
Advocates say they would welcome more from the Supreme Court on gender-notification policies.
7 min read
The Supreme Court is photographed, Friday, Feb. 27, 2026, in Washington.
The Supreme Court is photographed, Friday, Feb. 27, 2026, in Washington. The high court recently ruled that California policies that sometimes limit or discourage schools from disclosing information to parents about children’s gender transitions and expressions at school likely violate parents’ constitutional rights
Rahmat Gul/AP