Law & Courts

Political Alliance

By Rhea R. Borja — June 20, 2006 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A group of Oregon business leaders is partnering with the influential Oregon Education Association to fight two proposed ballot initiatives that could threaten state school aid—but only after the teachers’ union withdrew its own initiative that would have forced corporations to disclose certain tax-related information.

The 43,000-member OEA announced June 6 that it would stop trying to qualify its Oregon Corporate Accountability Act for the November ballot. In exchange, the Oregon Business Association will help the union oppose initiatives that would cut state revenue and place a cap on state spending.

“[The corporate-accountability proposal] was a wake-up call that it was time for them to step up to the plate and help education in Oregon, instead of saying public schools are the problem,” Larry Wolf, the president of the OEA, said of the business leaders.

If adopted, the plan would have required corporations in the state to publicize how much they paid in state taxes and the amount of their taxable incomes. Because of tax credits, deductions, and other credits, some companies pay just $10 a year in state income and property taxes.

The partnership with the OEA allows the Oregon Business Association to focus on defeating initiatives that would hurt the state, instead of fighting the corporate-accountability plan, said Lynn R. Lundquist, the president of the business group. “It’s better to put our dollars for the same cause instead of fighting each other,” he said.

The groups will focus on defeating two ballot initiatives backed by conservative organizations such as FreedomWorks, a national, 800,000-member Washington-based group chaired by former U.S. Rep. Dick Armey, R-Texas, and the Taxpayer Association of Oregon.

One would limit state spending by capping it at the percentage of population growth, plus inflation. The other would give taxpayers the same deduction on their state personal-income taxes that they receive on their federal tax returns. That change would deplete state coffers by $156 million in the current biennium, and by $835 million in the 2008 and 2009 two-year budget cycle, according to Our Oregon, a Portland-based coalition of self-described progressive groups.

Both measures appear likely to get enough signatures to qualify for the ballot.

The OEA and the business group fear that passage of the proposed initiatives would reduce the amount of aid available to Oregon’s public schools.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the June 21, 2006 edition of Education Week

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Unlocking Success for Struggling Adolescent Readers
The Science of Reading transformed K-3 literacy. Now it's time to extend that focus to students in grades 6 through 12.
Content provided by STARI
Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and K-12 education jubs at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Artificial Intelligence Webinar
MTSS + AI in Action: Reimagining Student Support
See how one district is using AI to strengthen MTSS, reduce workload, and improve student support.
Content provided by Panorama Education

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Supreme Court Seems Poised to Reject Trump's Birthright Order
Trump’s attendance in the birthright citizenship case marked the first time a sitting president has done this.
6 min read
President Donald Trump leaves the Supreme Court, on April 1, 2026, in Washington.
President Donald Trump leaves the Supreme Court on April 1, 2026, in Washington. The justices signaled skepticism of Trump’s bid to restrict birthright citizenship.
Anthony Peltier/AP
Law & Courts Birthright Citizenship Case Raises Stakes for Schools and Undocumented Students
Educators are paying close attention to the case on Trump's birthright citizenship order.
10 min read
President Donald Trump signs an executive order on birthright citizenship in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, Jan. 20, 2025.
President Donald Trump signs an executive order on birthright citizenship in the Oval Office of the White House on Jan. 20, 2025. The order, now before the U.S. Supreme Court, seeks to limit citizenship for some children born in the United States to immigrant parents without permanent legal status.
Evan Vucci/AP
Law & Courts Appeals Court Revives Lawsuit Over 1st Grader’s Black Lives Matter Drawing
A court revived a 1st grader 's claim she was punished for giving a drawing to a Black classmate.
4 min read
Seen is the drawing made by Viejo Elementary School first-grader B.B. that was entered into evidence. B.B. gave the drawing to her classmate, M.C., who is African American. M.C. thanked B.B.
Pictured is a drawing by a 1st grader in California and given to a Black classmate that is at the center of a First Amendment legal challenge over the student's alleged punishment.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
Law & Courts Supreme Court’s Gender Identity Ruling Leaves Schools Seeking Clarity
Advocates say they would welcome more from the Supreme Court on gender-notification policies.
7 min read
The Supreme Court is photographed, Friday, Feb. 27, 2026, in Washington.
The Supreme Court is photographed, Friday, Feb. 27, 2026, in Washington. The high court recently ruled that California policies that sometimes limit or discourage schools from disclosing information to parents about children’s gender transitions and expressions at school likely violate parents’ constitutional rights
Rahmat Gul/AP