Equity & Diversity

Feds to Districts: Policies Must Not Chill Enrollment of Immigrant Students

By Lesli A. Maxwell — May 08, 2014 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

UPDATED

Officials in the U.S. Departments of Justice and Education on Thursday warned school district officials to cease using policies and practices that “chill” or discourage students from enrolling in school because they, or their parents, may not have legal immigration status.

In a new, four-page guidance that updates a similar one issued three years ago, top civil rights officials in the two federal agencies write that they’ve recently become aware of student-enrollment practices that may “chill or discourage the participation, or lead to the exclusion, of students based on their or their parents’ or guardians’ actual or perceived citizenship or immigration status.”

“These practices contravene Federal law,” the letter states.

As it did three years ago, the latest guidance spells out the legal obligations of school district officials to provide equal educational opportunities to all children who reside within district boundaries, citing both federal civil rights law and the 1982 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Plyler v. Doe, which declared that states cannot bar students who are undocumented immigrants from enrolling in public school.

The new guidance includes a fact sheet and a frequently asked questions document that outline the types of documentation that districts may request for proof of residency as well as proof of age when students enroll. Lease agreements, water bills, and phone bills are among the documents that may be requested, but in the case of homeless students, no such proof of residency is required. To prove age, districts may ask for birth certificates, but cannot deny access if students do not provide one or if they provide a foreign birth certificate. Family bibles, medical records, and previous school records could all be used as proof of age, according to the guidance.

It also makes clear that while districts may ask for students’ Social Security numbers, they may not deny them enrollment should students’ parents elect not to provide the number. And districts cannot require parents and guardians to provide their Social Security numbers as a condition for enrollment. Districts that ask for Social Security numbers must disclose to students and parents that providing them is voluntary.

The guidance also suggests that districts may elect to enroll every child who comes to them, and they may ask for documents related to age and residency after the student has already started attending school. It also makes clear that federal law requires districts to provide complete enrollment information in languages that can be understood by parents and guardians who are not proficient in English. All the new documents were published in both English and Spanish.

“This 2014 guidance is a timely reminder that district and school-based personnel can and should do things that make the school environment more welcoming to immigrant families,” said James Ferg-Cadima, the Washington regional counsel for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, or MALDEF. “These documents are timely, needed, and accessible.”

MALDEF is one of several civil rights and legal aid organizations that receive complaints from immigrant families about practices that make enrollment difficult or impossible. Those tend to spike at the beginning of each new school year and come from all over the country, Ferg-Cadima said.

“Most of our cases are resolved through phone calls or demand letters we send on behalf of families,” he said.

Complaints also end up in the hands of federal civil rights officials who have authority to investigate practices alleged to be discriminating against students and their family members based on national origin.

In recent years, a number of states have passed laws cracking down on undocumented immigrants, though it tends to be more routine local practices that present problems for immigrant families.

Alabama, which passed what was considered to be the toughest anti-immigration law in 2011, saw large numbers of immigrant families with school-aged children withdraw their children from public schooling and leave the state.

Though the law required school officials to ask newly enrolling students for their citizenship status and to report that data to the state, that provision, along with several others in the law, have been permanently blocked by a federal court.

Related Tags:

A version of this news article first appeared in the Learning the Language blog.


Commenting has been disabled on edweek.org effective Sept. 8. Please visit our FAQ section for more details. To get in touch with us visit our contact page, follow us on social media, or submit a Letter to the Editor.


Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Teaching Webinar
What’s Next for Teaching and Learning? Key Trends for the New School Year
The past 18 months changed the face of education forever, leaving teachers, students, and families to adapt to unprecedented challenges in teaching and learning. As we enter the third school year affected by the pandemic—and
Content provided by Instructure
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Curriculum Webinar
How Data and Digital Curriculum Can Drive Personalized Instruction
As we return from an abnormal year, it’s an educator’s top priority to make sure the lessons learned under adversity positively impact students during the new school year. Digital curriculum has emerged from the pandemic
Content provided by Kiddom
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Equity & Diversity Webinar
Leadership for Racial Equity in Schools and Beyond
While the COVID-19 pandemic continues to reveal systemic racial disparities in educational opportunity, there are revelations to which we can and must respond. Through conscientious efforts, using an intentional focus on race, school leaders can
Content provided by Corwin

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Equity & Diversity Reported Essay What the Indian Caste System Taught Me About Racism in American Schools
Born and raised in India, reporter Eesha Pendharkar isn’t convinced that America’s anti-racist efforts are enough to make students of color feel like they belong.
7 min read
Conceptual Illustration
Pep Montserrat for Education Week
Equity & Diversity Reported Essay Our Student Homeless Numbers Are Staggering. Schools Can Be a Bridge to a Solution
The pandemic has only made the student homelessness situation more volatile. Schools don’t have to go it alone.
5 min read
Conceptual illustration
Pep Montserrat for Education Week
Equity & Diversity How Have the Debates Over Critical Race Theory Affected You? Share Your Story
We want to hear how new constraints on teaching about racism have affected your schools.
1 min read
Illustrations.
Mary Hassdyk for Education Week
Equity & Diversity Opinion When Educational Equity Descends Into Educational Nihilism
Schools need to buckle down to engage and educate kids—not lower (or eliminate) expectations in the name of “equity.”
3 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty