Published Online: March 16, 2009
Published in Print: March 16, 2009, as The Teaching Effect

The Teaching Effect

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

When it comes to improving students' math skills, teacher professional development has more of an impact than new textbooks or technology, says a research review by the Center for Data-Driven Reform in Education at Johns Hopkins University's School of Education.

The review, published in the 2008 issue of the Review of Educational Research, looked at 87 previously released studies evaluating the effectiveness of math-improvement programs in elementary schools. The programs fell into three general categories—textbook changes, computer-assisted instruction, and professional development in specific teaching methods, such as cooperative learning.

The researchers found that the approaches aimed at changing teachers' daily instructional practices were the most effective in boosting students' scores.

"The debate about mathematics reform has focused primarily on curriculum, not on professional development or instruction," said Robert Slavin, director of the Center for Data-Driven Reform in Education and co-author of the review. "Yet the research review suggests that in terms of outcomes on math assessments, curriculum differences are less consequential than instructional differences."

Vol. 02, Issue 02, Page 7

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented

MORE EDUCATION JOBS >>