A Duty To Protect

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

The Idaho Supreme Court has ruled in a case involving a teenager's suicide that school districts in the state have a legal duty to prevent foreseeable harm to students.

In August, the court reinstated a lawsuit filed by James and Diane Brooks, the parents of a teenager who killed himself in 1991. The Brooks argued that their son's English teacher at Meridian High School should have warned them or school authorities that the boy had expressed suicidal thoughts in a class journal. The parents sued the teacher and the Meridian district for negligence.

The teacher, Laura Logan, said in court papers that she had stopped reading students' journals early in the academic year and merely checked to ensure students wrote in them regularly. She turned over the student's journal, which included several passages alluding to death and suicide, to the parents after the boy's death.

A lower court issued a summary ruling in favor of the teacher and district, agreeing that school officials were not responsible for protecting the boy from suicide. The judge also ruled that even if Logan had read the journal, she had no legal duty to take action.

The state high court reversed that decision based on the key issue of whether the school district had a duty to protect its students. In its ruling, the court said the Idaho legislature had created a "statutory duty which requires a school district to act reasonably in the face of foreseeable risks of harm'' to students. The court said the district could be held liable if it failed to take action when faced with evidence that a student was contemplating suicide, even if the suicide takes place off school grounds.

The court ruled that a jury must decide the factual questions of whether Logan read the student's journal before he committed suicide and whether she could have detected his suicidal thoughts if she had read it. The case will return to the lower court for a jury trial.

Vol. 07, Issue 02, Page 1-24

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories