Law & Courts

N.Y. Court Strikes Down Kiryas Joel Schools Law

By Mark Walsh — May 14, 1997 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The establishment of a New York school district to serve children with disabilities in a village of Orthodox Jews was unanimously struck down last week by the state’s highest court.

It was the second time the New York Court of Appeals has rejected a law creating a Kiryas Joel village district. The first such ruling was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which found in 1994 that New York lawmakers had violated the U.S. Constitution’s prohibition against government establishment of religion by creating a school district for a religious sect. (“Court Strikes District for Hasidic Sect,” July 13, 1994.)

After the Supreme Court ruling, state legislators wrote a new law authorizing a district for the village of Kiryas Joel, a community of Satmar Hasidic Jews about 50 miles northwest of New York City. Most children in the village attend religious schools. The public school district was created to serve children with disabilities because Hasidic parents were reluctant to send such children to public schools in neighboring communities.

The legislature took its lead from a concurring opinion by Justice Sandra Day O’Connor suggesting that a general state law allowing certain villages to create their own school districts might pass muster under the Constitution.

‘Impermissible Endorsement’

However, the new law was challenged once again by officials of the New York State School Boards Association. They argued that provisions of the law are so detailed as to make Kiryas Joel the only municipality out of more than 1,500 in the state eligible to create its own school district.

In its May 6 ruling in Grumet v. Cuomo, the state high court agreed that the new law also violates the U.S. Constitution’s establishment clause. The law “effectively conveys a message of impermissible governmental endorsement of the Satmar community of Kiryas Joel,” the court said.

Steven Benardo, the superintendent of the Kiryas Joel district, said the school board was considering several options, including appealing the ruling to the Supreme Court again.

“The republic hasn’t fallen as a result of the Kiryas Joel school district,” he said. “No one says we are doing anything inappropriate. So it is difficult to understand why some people are analyzing us in such microscopic detail.”

Related Tags:

Events

School Climate & Safety K-12 Essentials Forum Strengthen Students’ Connections to School
Join this free event to learn how schools are creating the space for students to form strong bonds with each other and trusted adults.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Webinar
Reframing Behavior: Neuroscience-Based Practices for Positive Support
Reframing Behavior helps teachers see the “why” of behavior through a neuroscience lens and provides practices that fit into a school day.
Content provided by Crisis Prevention Institute
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Mathematics Webinar
Math for All: Strategies for Inclusive Instruction and Student Success
Looking for ways to make math matter for all your students? Gain strategies that help them make the connection as well as the grade.
Content provided by NMSI

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Supreme Court Declines Case on Selective High School Aiming to Boost Racial Diversity
Some advocates saw the K-12 case as the logical next step after last year's decision against affirmative action in college admissions
7 min read
Rising seniors at the Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology gather on the campus in Alexandria, Va., Aug. 10, 2020. From left in front are, Dinan Elsyad, Sean Nguyen, and Tiffany Ji. From left at rear are Jordan Lee and Shibli Nomani. A federal appeals court’s ruling in May 2023 about the admissions policy at the elite public high school in Virginia may provide a vehicle for the U.S. Supreme Court to flesh out the intended scope of its ruling Thursday, June 29, 2023, banning affirmative action in college admissions.
A group of rising seniors at the Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology gather on the campus in Alexandria, Va., in August 2020. From left in front are, Dinan Elsyad, Sean Nguyen, and Tiffany Ji. From left at rear are Jordan Lee and Shibli Nomani. The U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 20 declined to hear a challenge to an admissions plan for the selective high school that was facially race neutral but designed to boost the enrollment of Black and Hispanic students.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Law & Courts School District Lawsuits Against Social Media Companies Are Piling Up
More than 200 school districts are now suing the major social media companies over the youth mental health crisis.
7 min read
A close up of a statue of the blindfolded lady justice against a light blue background with a ghosted image of a hands holding a cellphone with Facebook "Like" and "Love" icons hovering above it.
iStock/Getty
Law & Courts In 1974, the Supreme Court Recognized English Learners' Rights. The Story Behind That Case
The Lau v. Nichols ruling said students have a right to a "meaningful opportunity" to participate in school, but its legacy is complex.
12 min read
Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court William O. Douglas is shown in an undated photo.
U.S. Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, shown in an undated photo, wrote the opinion in <i>Lau</i> v. <i>Nichols</i>, the 1974 decision holding that the San Francisco school system had denied Chinese-speaking schoolchildren a meaningful opportunity to participate in their education.
AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Declines to Hear School District's Transgender Restroom Case
The case asked whether federal law protects transgender students on the use of school facilities that correspond to their gender identity.
4 min read
People stand on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 11, 2022, in Washington, D.C.
People stand on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 11, 2022, in Washington, D.C.
Mariam Zuhaib/AP