Law & Courts

Judge Might OK Replacement Teachers in Tacoma Strike

By Adam Lynn, The News Tribune, Wash. (MCT) — September 19, 2011 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

McMinimee said outside court it’s clear the judge is frustrated with teachers for defying his order.

A Pierce County Superior Court judge said Monday that he might authorize the Tacoma School District to hire replacement workers if striking teachers do not return to work as he ordered.

Judge Bryan Chushcoff suggested such an authorization might persuade the vast majority of the teachers, who have not shown up to work since Sept. 12, to return to their classrooms while their negotiators try to reach a contract agreement with the district. Classes were canceled for a sixth day Tuesday for the Tacoma district’s 28,000 students.

Should the judge grant such authorization, he said it would be up to the district to decide whether it wanted to hire temporary replacements, permanent replacements or come up with another plan altogether.

“Those are all possibilities,” Chushcoff said in court.

Tacoma School District spokesman Dan Voelpel said the district did not request the right to use replacement workers. “We want our teachers back in the classroom, not replacements,” he said.

The judge’s comments came during a hearing to iron out language of another order that requires teachers who haven’t complied with the judge’s back-to-work order to come into court to explain themselves.

The first batch of hearings for those people—including board members of the Tacoma Education Association—is scheduled for Sept. 27.

The district will be mailing to the other nearly 2,000 teachers walking the picket lines notice of the judge’s intent to hold contempt hearings against them should they not return to work before Sept. 27, either with a new contract or in compliance with his orders.

“I urge everyone to go back to work,” Chushcoff said.

The judge signed a temporary restraining order Wednesday that requires the teachers to return to work while negotiations continue. Most teachers have refused to do so. At another hearing Friday, the judge gave the two sides more time to work out an agreement, saying he would hold of on sanctions for now.

The district’s attorney, Shannon McMinimee, said it was clear that the judge was frustrated with the teachers for defying his order.

“He’s thinking creatively to provide the district with additional remedies and for himself to have additional remedies to address the noncompliance with his order,” she said. “It sounds like the court is not pleased with the continued violation of his order.”

The union’s attorney, Tyler Firkins, said the Tacoma Education Association would challenge any attempt to replace its members.

Related Tags:

Events

Ed-Tech Policy Webinar Artificial Intelligence in Practice: Building a Roadmap for AI Use in Schools
AI in education: game-changer or classroom chaos? Join our webinar & learn how to navigate this evolving tech responsibly.
Education Webinar Developing and Executing Impactful Research Campaigns to Fuel Your Ed Marketing Strategy 
Develop impactful research campaigns to fuel your marketing. Join the EdWeek Research Center for a webinar with actionable take-aways for companies who sell to K-12 districts.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Privacy & Security Webinar
Navigating Cybersecurity: Securing District Documents and Data
Learn how K-12 districts are addressing the challenges of maintaining a secure tech environment, managing documents and data, automating critical processes, and doing it all with limited resources.
Content provided by Softdocs

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Supreme Court Declines to Hear School District's Transgender Restroom Case
The case asked whether federal law protects transgender students on the use of school facilities that correspond to their gender identity.
4 min read
People stand on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 11, 2022, in Washington, D.C.
People stand on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 11, 2022, in Washington, D.C.
Mariam Zuhaib/AP
Law & Courts What a Proposed Ban on AI-Assisted ‘Deep Fakes’ Would Mean for Cyberbullying
Students who create AI-generated, intimate images of their classmates would be breaking federal law, if a new bill is enacted.
2 min read
AI Education concept in blue: A robot hand holding a pencil.
iStock/Getty
Law & Courts Supreme Court Declines Case on Corporal Punishment for Student With Autism
The justices refused to hear the appeal of an 11-year-old Louisiana student who alleges that two educators slapped her on her wrists.
3 min read
The Supreme Court building is seen on Capitol Hill in Washington, Jan. 10, 2023.
The Supreme Court building is seen on Capitol Hill in Washington, Jan. 10, 2023.
Patrick Semansky/AP
Law & Courts U.S. Supreme Court Declines Bid to Rename 'Brown v. Board of Education'
Descendants argued that their case, not the one from Topeka, Kan., should have topped the 1954 decision on racial segregation in schools.
3 min read
Linda Brown Smith stands in front of the Sumner School in Topeka, Kan., on May 8, 1964. The refusal of the public school to admit Brown in 1951, then nine years old, because she is black, led to the Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas. In 1954, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled the "separate but equal" clause and mandated that schools nationwide must be desegregated.
Linda Brown Smith stands in front of the Sumner School in Topeka, Kan., in 1964, a segregated white school where she had been denied enrollment in 1951, leading to the landmark 1954 U.S. Supreme Court decision striking down the "separate but equal" doctrine in the case that bears her family name, <i>Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.</i> The high court on Jan. 8 turned away an effort by descendants of the litigants in a companion desegregation case from South Carolina to rename the historic decision for their case, <i>Briggs</i> v. <i>Elliott</i>.
AP