Law & Courts

Can Parents Opt Kids Out of Reading LGBTQ+ Books? The Supreme Court Will Decide

By Mark Walsh — January 17, 2025 3 min read
The Supreme Court on Wednesday afternoon, April 19, 2023, in Washington.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear the appeal of parents who object on religious grounds to a Maryland school district’s policy of preventing them from opting their children out of LGBTQ+ inclusive “storybooks” used in elementary English/language arts classes.

Lower courts had refused to block the policy of the 160,000-student Montgomery County school district, and the parents’ case has become a rallying point among groups fighting sexual orientation- and gender identity-inclusive school policies.

A federal appeals court’s ruling “that parents essentially surrender their right to direct the religious upbringing of their children by sending them to public schools … contradicts centuries of our history and traditions,” says the appeal, filed by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty on behalf of a group of Christian and Muslim parents who objected to the books.

The school system in 2022 approved books such as Pride Puppy!, My Rainbow, and Uncle Bobby’s Wedding to help teach reading to students as young as pre-kindergarten. An associate superintendent said in court papers that the books were not meant to explicitly teach about gender identity and sexual orientation in elementary school, but to be a classroom option for students to discover and for teachers to recommend to some students.

The parents sued after the district began enforcing the no opt-out policy for the 2023-24 school year. They argue that the policy violates their First Amendment right to free exercise of religion and their 14th Amendment due-process right to direct the upbringing of their children, an argument that has also been made in court cases about policies regarding how districts treat students who say they’re transgender.

The case “presents a pressing issue of nationwide importance,” says the parents’ appeal in Mahmoud v. Taylor, and the lower courts’ “deference to public school policymaking is particularly dubious when it comes to instruction on family life and human sexuality.”

The appeal has the support of friend-of-the-court briefs filed by several leading religious liberty scholars, the Christian Legal Society, and 25 states.

“The lower courts are hopelessly confused—and largely wrong—about the nature of religious coercion in the school instructional context,” said the scholars’ brief, led by Douglas Laycock of both the University of Texas and University of Virginia. “When the government seeks to instruct students about value-laden sexuality and gender issues in a way that contradicts their parents’ religious instruction, without telling the parents or providing an opt-out, the parents’ First Amendment rights have been burdened.”

The Montgomery County district in October dropped Pride Puppy! and My Rainbow from the curriculum, which continues to use other titles such as Intersection Allies, Born Ready, and Jacob’s Room to Choose.

School district says it is trying to create a safe and inclusive learning environment

The district, in a brief urging the court not to take up the case, said the challengers “seek to unsettle a decades-old consensus that parents who choose to send their children to public school are not deprived of their right to freely exercise their religion simply because their children are exposed to curricular materials the parents find offensive.”

The district noted that it first tried to accommodate opt-out requests by parents, no matter what the basis.

“The growing number of opt-out requests, however, gave rise to three related concerns: high student absenteeism, the infeasibility of administering opt-outs across classrooms and schools, and the risk of exposing students who believe the storybooks represent them and their families to social stigma and isolation,” the district’s brief says.

Such consequences would defeat the district’s efforts to ensure safe and inclusive classroom environments, the brief says.

The case could be argued in April and decided by the end of the court term in late June.

Special education case was also granted by the court

The justices also granted review in a special education case that raises the question of which standard courts must apply when it comes to the rights of students with disabilities under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

The question in A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools is whether those statutes are violated with respect to students with disabilities only when school officials act with “bad faith or gross misjudgment,” as opposed to a more lenient standard of not having to prove any wrongful intent. The case could also be argued and decided in the current term.

Events

School Climate & Safety Webinar Engaging Every Student: How to Address Absenteeism and Build Belonging
Gain valuable insights and practical solutions to address absenteeism and build a more welcoming and supportive school environment.
Student Well-Being K-12 Essentials Forum Social-Emotional Learning 2025: Examining Priorities and Practices
Join this free virtual event to learn about SEL strategies, skills, and to hear from experts on the use and expansion of SEL programs.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Professional Development Webinar
Inside PLCs: Proven Strategies from K-12 Leaders
Join an expert panel to explore strategies for building collaborative PLCs, overcoming common challenges, and using data effectively.
Content provided by Otus

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Legal Fights Highlight Clashes Over Transgender Students’ Pronouns in Schools
A federal court weighs the case of a teacher who refused to use students' chosen names and pronouns, as similar questions arise elsewhere.
9 min read
John Kluge, a former Indiana teacher, pictured in an undated photo.
John M. Kluge is an Indiana teacher who was dismissed for refusing to use transgender students' chosen names and pronouns.
Courtesy of Alliance Defending Freedom
Law & Courts How Educators Feel About the Supreme Court's Decision to Uphold TikTok Ban
The Supreme Court upheld a law targeting TikTok, increasing the uncertainty for an app highly popular among U.S. educators and students.
6 min read
Sarah Baus, left, of Charleston, S.C., and Tiffany Cianci, who says she is a "long-form educational content creator," livestream to TikTok outside the Supreme Court, on Jan. 10, 2025, in Washington.
Sarah Baus, left, of Charleston, S.C., and Tiffany Cianci, who says she is a "long-form educational content creator," livestream to TikTok outside the Supreme Court, on Jan. 10, 2025, in Washington.
Jacquelyn Martin/AP
Law & Courts After 50 Years, This School District Is No Longer Segregated, Court Says
A federal appeals court panel declared that the Tucson, Ariz., district was now legally desegregated a half century after it was first sued.
3 min read
Scales of justice and Gavel on wooden table and Lawyer or Judge working with agreement in Courtroom, Justice and Law concept.
Pattanaphong Khuankaew/iStock
Law & Courts Biden's Title IX Rule to Expand Protections of Trans Students Struck Down
The Title IX rule improperly expands sex-discrimination protection to gender identity, the judge ruled.
4 min read
A picture of a gavel on a target.
Bill Oxford/Getty