School & District Management

Tougher Requirements Ahead for Teacher Prep

By Stephen Sawchuk — July 09, 2013 6 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A panel tapped by the national accreditation body for teacher preparation has finalized a set of standards that, for the first time, establishes minimum admissions criteria and requires programs to use much-debated “value added” measures, where available.

The action promises to have major ramifications for how programs select, prepare, and gauge the success of new teachers. Already, programs planning to seek the seal of approval from the Council for Accreditation of Educator Preparation say the standards are significantly more demanding than those used by the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education, one of two accreditors that preceded CAEP.

“These standards, when you get down to it, are really different, and they are much more challenging,” said Michael J. Maher, the assistant dean of the education school at North Carolina State University in Raleigh. “Even as a college that’s been NCATE-accredited and made our way through that process, we clearly see some new things we’re going to have to do.”

The commission finalized the CAEP standards over a two-day period last month. CAEP’s board is expected to sign off on them next month.

With its inclusion of performance measures and requirements for surveying graduates and employers on program quality, the draft embraces some of the very same concepts that many higher education representatives opposed during a 2012 attempt by the U.S. Department of Education to negotiate revisions to the federal accountability rules for teacher preparation.

Observers said the CAEP standards’ specificity and emphasis on performance were unusual in accreditation circles.

“This is the most measured and evidence-heavy proposed accreditation process I’ve ever been privy to,” Peter Ewell, the vice president at the National Center for Higher Education Management Systems, a research center that works to improve college efficiency, told the panel during a meeting last month. “You are being very gutsy.”

The new standards fall into five broad categories: equipping candidates with content knowledge and appropriate pedagogical tools; working in partnership with districts to provide strong student-teaching practice and feedback; recruiting a diverse and academically strong group of candidates; demonstrating that graduates are successful boosting P-12 students’ academic achievement; and maintaining a quality-assurance system.

Preparation programs would be assessed on the evidence they produced to meet each standard.

Sticky Wicket

Although several of the panel’s proposals were controversial, most were preserved. The panel kept a requirement for programs to set minimum entry requirements for each cohort of candidates, including a cohort minimum GPA average of 3.0 and an average score in the top third of the distribution on a nationally normed achievement test. The panel approved the language, despite concerns that such stipulations might harm the diversity of the teaching force.

The requirement will apply to all teacher-candidates, even if they have been out of high school or college for some time. CAEP will phase in the entry standard over several years, but it will nevertheless be a stretch for some programs.

“If you have an open-admissions policy, you are not going to be accredited,” noted Mary Brabeck, the dean of New York University’s education school and the chairwoman of the subcommittee that drafted the standard on selection.

And although the draft standards’ proposal to highlight a small number of “gold standard” programs that excel on the five standards got a chilly reception from the field, the commission held firm to the initiative.

The stickiest point for the panel proved to be reconciling different opinions about using student-achievement measures to help gauge program quality. Representatives of the national teachers’ unions feared such measures might be misused, or could dominate other considerations.

“We don’t want our institutions of higher ed. to chase things that have been put in place that are not serving our kids or our teachers,” said Becky Pringle, the vice president of the National Education Association. “I don’t want us to build on top of things that were not done well.”

The finalized draft makes more explicit that programs must take multiple measures into account in determining how well graduates fare in the field. But they must still consider “all available growth measures,” including value-added ones, used by the state for evaluating teachers.

“It is a remarkable thing to say that a professional program is going to trace its graduates into the field,” said Richard De Lisi, a panelist and the dean of the graduate school of education at Rutgers University in New Jersey. “I don’t think any other field does this to its graduates. It’s absolutely path-breaking.”

The commission also established eight criteria that programs would have to report annually, such as graduation rates and teaching effectiveness. Because accreditation typically occurs only once every seven years, the annual report will help gauge programs’ shorter-term changes, panelists said.

New Role, New Questions

The finalized standards brought a variety of opinions about how they will play out on the ground.

“Some institutions either won’t be able to meet the standards, or they’ll look at it and say it’s too cost-intensive, labor-intensive, requires too many changes, or that they don’t have the high-quality candidates needed,” Mr. Maher said. “You may see some closing of programs.”

He said his university, which produces about 400 teachers each year, will retool the surveys it sends to employers, use value-added measures and performance-assessment data to judge programs’ impact, and raise its own admissions standard, even though it’s already at the 3.0 mark.

Sam Evans, the dean of the school of education at Western Kentucky University, said some of the new measures will have to be approached cautiously. For instance, he noted that most student-growth data are limited to reading and math, even though colleges produce teachers in dozens of subjects.

The standard on student-teaching, he added, will require colleges and school districts to take their work together more seriously.

But overall, he said, “I see this as an opportunity, not a challenge. We have to keep our P-12 students foremost in our work.”

Robert C. Pianta, the dean of the Curry School of Education at the University of Virginia, in Charlottesville, meanwhile, said he wished the commission had elaborated on some of the implications of the standards’ focus on evidence.

“Programs will struggle in terms of defining evidence, the technical properties for collecting evidence, selecting reliable and valid indicators, and the use of the evidence,” he said. “And there’s not a lot of guidance on that.”

The role of teasing out best practices, disseminating them, and helping institutions work together to inculcate them may well fall to CAEP itself.

“This is a cultural shift for our field, and we won’t be able to make it successfully unless we engage programs to become more sophisticated as to the use of evidence,” CAEP President James G. Cibulka acknowledged during the meeting.

Finally, panelists and observers alike said, CAEP will need to show that it will hold institutions to meeting the higher standards—a delicate balancing act for an organization whose revenue is generated largely by the programs it assesses.

Between 2007 and 2013, NCATE denied or revoked accreditation only 11 times, records show.

If the CAEP standards are enforced, “it will mean some people will no longer be in the business of preparing teachers, said Mr. Evans. “Anything less than quality is not acceptable, and I think for too long we’ve pulled people through the knothole and allowed programs to receive accreditation.”

Added Ms. Brabeck of NYU: “Ultimately, we have to believe that the accreditor is going to uphold the standard.”

A version of this article appeared in the July 11, 2013 edition of Education Week as Teacher Ed. Is Facing Higher Bar


Special Education Webinar Reading, Dyslexia, and Equity: Best Practices for Addressing a Threefold Challenge
Learn about proven strategies for instruction and intervention that support students with dyslexia.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
School & District Management Webinar
Leading Systemic Redesign: Strategies from the Field
Learn how your school community can work together to redesign the school system, reengineer instruction, & co-author personalized learning.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Personalized Learning Webinar
No Time to Waste: Individualized Instruction Will Drive Change
Targeted support and intervention can boost student achievement. Join us to explore tutoring’s role in accelerating the turnaround. 
Content provided by Varsity Tutors for Schools

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

School & District Management Someone Spread an Unfounded Rumor About Your School. Here's What to Do Next
Hoaxes have become more pervasive as political tensions rise in schools.
6 min read
Two male leaders squeezing and destroy the word "hoax" in a vice.
Illustration by Gina Tomko/Education Week and Getty
School & District Management ACLU Texas Files OCR Complaint Over a District's Anti-Trans Book Ban
The group claims the Keller school district's new policy to remove books about gender fluidity from library shelves violates federal law.
4 min read
Banned books are visible at the Central Library, a branch of the Brooklyn Public Library system, in New York City on Thursday, July 7, 2022. The books are banned in several public schools and libraries in the U.S., but young people can read digital versions from anywhere through the library. The Brooklyn Public Library offers free membership to anyone in the U.S. aged 13 to 21 who wants to check out and read books digitally in response to the nationwide wave of book censorship and restrictions.
Banned books are on diplay at the Central Library, a branch of the Brooklyn Public Library system, in New York City on Thursday, July 7, 2022. Some of these books are among those banned by school districts in Texas.
Ted Shaffrey/AP
School & District Management Political Tensions in Schools Are 'Pervasive,' Principals Say
High school principals reported high levels of student conflict due to political beliefs and parent efforts to limit curriculum about race.
6 min read
Image of political tension surrounding school leaders.
Collage by Laura Baker/Education Week via iStock/Getty
School & District Management Litter Boxes in Schools: How a Disruptive and Demeaning Hoax Frustrated School Leaders
A hoax claiming that schools were providing litter boxes to students wasted school leaders' time as they worked to debunk it.
6 min read
Smartphone with blue and red colored hoax bubbles floating up off of the screen onto a dark black background with illegible lines of text also in the background.
iStock/Getty Images Plus