Report Roundup

School Improvement

"Why It's Wrong to Write Off the SIG Program"

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

A gloomy federal analysis of the Obama administration's multibillion dollar School Improvement Grant program missed the boat, according to a report released last week by FutureEd, a nonpartisan think tank at Georgetown University.

The new report was written by two former U.S. Department of Education officials—Alan Ginsburg and Marshall S. Smith. They say the earlier report, commissioned by the Education Department's Institute of Education Sciences, ignored more-localized studies that gave a brighter picture of SIG's success. It also had some design flaws and missed a chance to communicate best practices in states and districts where SIG worked, they say.

The IES report found that the SIG grant, which poured more than $7 billion into low-performing schools, had no significant impact on math and reading scores or high school graduation. The IES study's authors dispute the new findings.

Vol. 38, Issue 05, Page 4

Published in Print: September 19, 2018, as School Improvement
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented