Emotional Disabilities Are Misunderstood

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

In the March 21 article "Fact Sheet: Students With Emotional Disabilities," the reporter cites a study of school shooters as evidence that special education students are no more likely than their peers to be shooters. Rather than concluding that emotional disturbance isn't a potential marker for becoming a shooter, perhaps a better conclusion is that emotional disturbance is underidentified by the schools.

That same study found that 34 percent of the shooters had a mental-health evaluation, 17 percent had been diagnosed with a mental illness or behavior disorder before the attack, 78 percent had suicidal thoughts or had attempted suicide, and 61 percent had a history of depression.

The most current figures from the U.S. Department of Education document that a mere 0.5 percent of students received special education services as emotionally disturbed between the years 2011 and 2015. Any stigma these troubled students had didn't come from being identified as emotionally disturbed for special education; it likely came from their behaviors—behaviors that should have signaled a referral for special education evaluation.

Daniel P. Hallahan
Professor Emeritus
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia

Vol. 37, Issue 26, Page 24

Published in Print: April 11, 2018, as Emotional Disabilities Are Misunderstood
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories