High Court Denies Case on Science Standards

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear the appeal of a group of Kansas parents and students who object on religious grounds to the state's adoption of the Next Generation Science Standards.

The group alleged in a lawsuit against the Kansas state education department that the standards, developed by 26 states based on a framework published by the National Research Council, address religious questions by removing a "theistic" viewpoint and creating a "non-theistic worldview" in science instruction in the public schools.

Citizens for Objective Public Education, or COPE, argued that Kansas's 2013 adoption of science standards based on the Next Generation Science Standards and the National Research Council's framework constituted an unconstitutional government establishment of religion and also violated the First Amendment free exercise of religion rights of the families.

A federal district court held in 2014 that the group and its members lacked standing to bring the suit because the alleged injuries were abstract.

In an April decision, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, in Denver, unanimously upheld the district court and rejected COPE's theories of legal injury.

Related Blog

"COPE does not offer any facts to support the conclusion that the standards condemn any religion or send a message of endorsement," the 10th Circuit court said. "And any fear of biased instruction is premised on COPE's predictions of school districts' responses to the standards—an attempt by COPE to recast a future injury as a present one."

Viewpoint Sought

The U.S. Supreme Court asked Kansas to respond to COPE's appeal, and the state stressed that curriculum decisions remain a matter for local school districts.

"Although Kansas law requires the state board of education to establish curriculum standards, locally elected school boards remain free to determine their own curricula," said the brief filed by Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt. He added that COPE had not alleged that children involved in the suit attended districts where the standards had been implemented.

The Supreme Court Nov. 14 declined without comment to hear the group's appeal in COPE v. Kansas State Board of Education (Case No. 16-229).

Vol. 36, Issue 14, Page 21

Published in Print: November 30, 2016, as High Court Denies Case on Science Standards
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories