Let's Assess the Whole Child

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

I write in regard to the recent article "States, Districts Eyeing Chance to Craft Innovative Tests" (July 20, 2016). It excites me to see the possibility of schools being allowed to seek out a viable alternative to the testing fiasco. The standardized test was designed by assuming what students could do and then turning those skills into a paper-and-pencil task.

Now is the time to reverse that process by actually assessing what students can do. For example, a standardized test asks students to name the steps of the scientific method. Wouldn't it make more sense to have students do a science project that demonstrates their understanding of the application of the scientific method? And since projects can be set at any level, such an assessment would be perfect for special-needs students of all types.

We now have the opportunity to move away from the archaic standardized test and assess the whole child to assure children are prepared for a future of critical thinking. And since assessment drives the curriculum, no more would teachers be required to teach to the test.

The opportunity of a lifetime is here. We shouldn't blow it.

Eldon "Cap" Lee
Education Consultant
Burnsville, N.C.

Vol. 36, Issue 02, Page 21

Published in Print: August 31, 2016, as Let's Assess the Whole Child
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories