News in Brief

S.C. High Court Rules for Poor, Rural Students

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

A 21-year-old legal battle waged by more than two dozen districts that accused the state of South Carolina of failing to provide a "minimally adequate" education for poor and rural students has come to an end, after the state Supreme Court ruled in the districts' favor.

In its ruling last month, the court said the state's failure to address the "effects of pervasive poverty on students within the plaintiffs' school districts prevented those students from receiving the required opportunity."

But Chief Justice Jean Toal, who wrote the majority opinion, did not absolve the districts for their role in exacerbating funding inequities, saying that local spending priorities—for athletic facilities and other auxiliary services while students languished in "crumbling schools and toxic academic environments"—were also part of the problem.

Vol. 34, Issue 13, Page 4

Published in Print: December 3, 2014, as S.C. High Court Rules for Poor, Rural Students
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories