Report Roundup

NCLB Accountability

"The Impact of No Child Left Behind's Accountability Sanctions on School Performance: Regression Discontinuity Evidence From North Carolina"

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

A new study from the National Bureau of Economic Research shows that there may be some upside to the No Child Left Behind Act's much-maligned accountability system.

Under the law, adequate yearly progress requires states to increase the number of students rated "proficient" on state tests each year and establishes tiered consequences for states that fail to meet the goals in subsequent years.

Policy experts, however, argue that the law drives states to "dummy down" their academic standards so that more students can be classified as proficient.

Researchers Thomas Ahn and Jacob Vigdor found that some of AYP's sanctions actually proved beneficial. For example, they found the early, more lenient sanctions for schools that initially failed to meet AYP—such as being slapped with the failing label or allowing students to transfer out of the school—positively affected performance in the North Carolina school system they examined.

Vol. 34, Issue 06, Page 5

Published in Print: October 1, 2014, as NCLB Accountability
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories