Philosophies of Funders Can Influence Research

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

The letter from Jeanne Allen ("Center for Education Reform 'Skeptical' of Charter Study," Aug. 7, 2013) questioning the validity of many educational research studies reminded me of a conversation I had several years ago with the main researcher of a study out of one of our leading universities.

I asked: "How can you base these studies on the test scores presented to you by these schools? Surely you must know that many, if not most, of these schools are cheating on these tests."

I was shocked by his response: "Yes, we know that, but they're all we have."

Well, just think about research studies based on scores provided by Atlanta and Washington, and you get the picture.

Sadly, these are difficult economic times, and even our most prestigious universities are turning out "studies" that contradict one another, in accordance with the respective philosophies of the organizations or individuals that financed the studies.

Anyone truly interested in improving K-12 education should advocate for the highest level of research, starting with school tests that are professionally administered by a disinterested party.

Linda Mele Johnson
Long Beach, Calif.
The writer is a retired teacher.

Vol. 33, Issue 03, Page 32

Published in Print: September 11, 2013, as Philosophies of Funders Can Influence Research
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories