Individualizing Schools Is Path to Real Learning

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

I write in regard to the blog post "Senate Democrats to Unveil NCLB Reauthorization Bill" (Politics K-12, edweek.org, June 4, 2013). Again we see the attempt to "tweak" the failed status quo.

The reality is that it can't be tweaked because the problem is systemic. The efforts of the U.S. Senate are still based on the 18th-century education system whose purpose was defined by Thomas Jefferson as raking a few "geniuses" from the "rubbish."

A standardized test is not an indicator of academic achievement. It is an indicator of testing achievement, a completely different mindset than what is needed to determine real learning. The fundamental purpose of education is for students to graduate from school being able to do something, not say they can do something.

"Proficiency" is scoring at the same range on an artificial test at the same time as everyone else. With a range of testing skills and abilities, beginning with students with the most severe cognitive disabilities across the spectrum to those "book-learned" kids, and recognizing that obstacles like childhood stress truly do slow the brain, how could anyone ever think that everyone would be at the same place at the same time? Unless, of course, we put the low-scoring students into the streets.

The only solution is to develop individualized schools, taking kids from where they are, not from where we wish they were, and teaching kids in the way of the real world, not in an artificial testing world. Can this really be done?

Of course it can: We did it at my former school, the Village School in Milwaukee, in 1995.

Cap Lee
Burnsville, N.C.
The writer is a retired teacher and principal.

Vol. 32, Issue 36, Page 35

Published in Print: July 10, 2013, as Individualizing Schools Is Path to Real Learning
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories