News in Brief

Appeals Court Upholds 'Dog Sniff' of Backpack

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

A federal appeals court last week upheld a "dog sniff" of a student's backpack for illegal drugs at a school in Springfield, Mo.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit, in St. Louis, held unanimously that the dog-sniff of student belongings in a classroom at Central High School in 2010, while students were not present, did not violate the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.

The panel was not in full agreement that separating backpacks from students for the dog-sniff constituted a "seizure." Even so, the court said, "we conclude that the seizure was part of a reasonable procedure to maintain the safety and security of students at the school."

Vol. 32, Issue 24, Page 5

Published in Print: March 13, 2013, as Appeals Court Upholds 'Dog Sniff' of Backpack
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories