History Instruction Often Marginalized

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

One of the longest-running complaints in education is that history is "boring" and is presented as a list of disconnected names, dates, and events to be memorized. However, rather than rehash a rebuttal to the unsubstantiated and anecdotal Commentary "Let's Overhaul How We Teach History," (Jan. 30, 2013), it should be apparent to most observers that the "boring" condemnation is no longer relevant.

The problem since so-called reformers, who often lack a sense of history themselves, fixated on standardized testing is that history has been eliminated or marginalized. Let's overhaul what we teach.

Tedd Levy
Old Saybrook, Conn.
The writer is a retired social studies teacher.

Vol. 32, Issue 22, Page 24

Published in Print: February 27, 2013, as History Instruction Often Marginalized
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories