On Hazelwood Ruling and Student Journalism

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

Thank you for reporting on the Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier case, 25 years after the U.S. Supreme Court reversed itself on free-speech protection for secondary school students ("Student-Press Ruling Resonates From 1988," Jan. 9, 2013).

Included in the article were references to the Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District case of 1969. While Hazelwood concerned school administrators' censoring of articles in school newspapers, Tinker dealt with the right of students to wear black armbands to protest the Vietnam War.

The Supreme Court ruled in Tinker that neither "students or teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." Hazelwood allowed school administrators to limit those rights if they were worried such freedom might disrupt learning or discipline. Thus Hazelwood, Mo., administrators could remove stories about divorce, teen pregnancy, and other sensitive issues prior to the school newspaper's publication.

At a time when children surf the Internet and engage in instant messaging and Facebook friending, it seems odd that young journalists can be prevented from reporting on "sensitive issues" when care is taken to protect the identities of students. Landmark Supreme Court cases might make interesting special reports for school newspapers.

Unfortunately such landmark cases, from Plessy v. Ferguson, Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, and Korematsu v. United States to Griswold v. Connecticut, Loving v. Virginia, Tinker v. Des Moines, and Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission are not taught in many high school history classes.

Betty R. Kazmin
Medford, Ore.

The writer is a retired Los Angeles teacher.

Vol. 32, Issue 19, Page 26

Published in Print: January 30, 2013, as On Hazelwood Ruling and Student Journalism
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories