Common Standards Are a 'Living Work'

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

Educators at every level—from teachers and principals to chief state school officers—have become increasingly comfortable using evidence-based research data to make sound educational decisions to maximize student learning outcomes. The developers of the Common Core State Standards are no exception. On the introductory pages of the English/language arts, or ELA, standards is this statement: "The standards are intended to be a living work: As new and better evidence emerges, the standards will be revised accordingly."

Interestingly enough, some "new and better evidence" about text-complexity measures has emerged ("New Research Expands Thinking on Text Complexity,", Aug. 15, 2012). Specifically, a 2012 study conducted by Student Achievement Partners found that several other text-complexity measures clearly support the goals of ELA text-complexity requirements: Renaissance Learning's ATOS, the Educational Testing Service's SourceRater, Pearson's Reading Maturity, Questar Assessments' Degrees of Reading Power, the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level test, and MetaMetrics' Lexile. The study can be found on the Council of Chief State School Officers' website.

As a result of this "new and better evidence," the common-core authors have posted a supplement to Appendix A of their work on new research on text-complexity grade bands for all of the reading measures, highlighting the CCSSO's 2010 acknowledgment of a "need for further research into text-complexity measurement." The supplement provides a much more inclusive list, allowing educators to use what they already have in place.

There is no question that making changes to the common core must not be done impulsively; rather, it must be based on evidence-based research. To maintain the common language and common goals, the targets must be steady. At the same time, when independent, compelling scientific evidence emerges, the authors of the common core have proved the standards really are a "living work"—and have evolved accordingly.

Alexa Posny
Senior Vice President
State and Federal Programs
Renaissance Learning
Madison, Wis.
The author served as the U.S. Department of Education's assistant secretary for special education and rehabilitative services from 2009 to 2012.

Vol. 32, Issue 09, Page 26

Published in Print: October 24, 2012, as Common Standards Are a 'Living Work'
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories