News in Brief

Calif. Schools Liable For Hiring Molesters

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

School districts can be held liable for administrators who learn an employee may be prone to molesting children but fail to take action to protect students, the California Supreme Court ruled last week.

The unanimous ruling came in a 2007 case of molestation of a 15-year-old boy by the head guidance counselor at a Los Angeles County high school. The decision overturned trial and appellate court decisions upholding the dismissal of the lawsuit filed by the unidentified student, who was molested over eight months.

The William S. Hart Union High School District had argued that administrators should not be held liable for the actions of an employee because they oversee the entire school, not individual students. But the justices said administrators have a duty to protect children.

Administrators knew the counselor's history of sexual misconduct but still hired her, the court found.

The court also said that administrators are liable if they learn of misconduct while an employee is on the job and fail to adequately supervise, train, or fire the employee.

Vol. 31, Issue 24, Page 4

Published in Print: March 14, 2012, as Calif. Schools Liable For Hiring Molesters
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories