Study of Upward Bound Used Flawed Procedures

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

For more than 40 years, I was the director of the TRIO programs at the University of Utah, which was included in the 2006 study of Upward Bound that Grover J. "Russ" Whitehurst is quoted as calling "rigorous [and] randomized" in the Jan. 26, 2012, post "Group Says Study Calling Upward Bound 'Ineffective' Was Flawed" in your Inside School Research blog.

I can say that we at the university did not see our opposition to the study as being opposed to evaluation, which we were not. It was about being required to mislead low-income children and their parents by saying they were being recruited for an educational program when they were actually being recruited as research guinea pigs.

According to the University of Utah's Institutional Review Board, or IRB, the study design would never have been approved had the university's IRB been involved; the board saw the design as ethically questionable and encouraged the use of other approaches to assess the program.

We applaud the work of U.S. Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, and others in stopping the study.

Kathryn Felker
TRIO Director, 1972-Feb. 15, 2012
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah

Vol. 31, Issue 21, Page 30

Published in Print: February 22, 2012, as Study of Upward Bound Used Flawed Procedures
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories