Report Roundup

Teacher Evaluation

"Rethinking Teacher Evaluation in Chicago"

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Both a value-added method and principals' observations tied to a teaching framework identified the same teachers as particularly high- or low-performing under Chicago's teacher-evaluation pilot, a study has found.

But principals struggled to provide high-quality "coaching" and support to teachers based on the results, says the report from the Consortium for Chicago School Research.

The study is the second-year analysis of Chicago's pilot teacher-evaluation system. It looks at the performance of teachers in selected elementary schools in which the system was piloted from 2008-09 to 2009-10.

The authors compared ratings given by principals with those of external evaluators. They also analyzed the relationship between principals' observations and value-added estimates for the teachers, where available. Value-added estimates use test scores to measure how much growth an average student makes in a year and then compare that to students' actual performance. Case studies were also conducted in eight of the pilot schools.

Vol. 31, Issue 13, Page 5

Published in Print: December 7, 2011, as Teacher Evaluation
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories