Report Roundup

Charter Authorizers Get Middling Marks

"Index of Essential Practices"

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Only a handful of the dozens of agencies across the country that approve and oversee charter schools are doing a perfect job of it, a reportRequires Adobe Acrobat Reader by a charter authorizers’ group says.

The National Association of Charter School Authorizers, a nonprofit group based in Chicago, surveyed 381 organizations charged with approving the largely independent public schools. The survey’s aim was to measure the degree to which the authorizers had adopted 12 basic practices that the national group had found to be key. Such practices included: interviewing all charter applicants; establishing criteria for approval, renewal, and evaluation of schools; enlisting expert panels to review applications; and approving charters for only five-year terms.

Three authorizers—the Albuquerque, N.M., public schools, the Chicago school system, and the Philadelphia school district—scored high on all 12 criteria. At the low end of the scale was the Mitchell County school board in southwest Georgia. It met three of the group’s criteria.

Vol. 31, Issue 08, Page 4

Published in Print: October 19, 2011, as Charter Authorizers Get Middling Marks
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories