News in Brief

Justices Seek U.S. Views on Special Education Case

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

The U.S. Supreme Court has asked the U.S. solicitor general’s office for its opinion on whether a parent may seek compensation from a school district that allegedly failed to identify a student’s disabilities.

The case involves a girl’s mother who cited the “child find” requirement of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act in a complaint against the Compton, Calif., district. That requirement says states must ensure that all children with disabilities who are in need of special education services are identified, located, and evaluated.

An administrative law judge ordered as much as 150 hours of compensatory tutoring for the girl, but refused the family’s request for a private school placement at public expense. The district appealed that ruling, arguing that if the family prevailed, students with disabilities would be able to bring “educational malpractice” claims against districts.

The appeal is Compton Unified School District v. Addison. The solicitor generals office typically takes several months to respond to the high courts request for its views on a case.

Vol. 30, Issue 29, Page 4

Published in Print: April 27, 2011, as Justices Seek U.S. Views on Special Education Case
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories