News in Brief

Court Upholds Schools' Firing Of Workers for Old Crimes

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Ohio school districts didn't violate the law when they fired dozens of employees over long-ago criminal convictions, the state supreme court ruled last week.

In a 5-2 decision, the court said the 2007 state law that required school districts to dig deep into the criminal histories of employees and fire those convicted of certain offenses was constitutional.

The law was part of a broad crackdown on school employees spurred by a series in The Columbus Dispatch spotlighting the failures of Ohio's teacher-discipline system. One provision required background checks of nonlicensed school employees going back decades. People who had been convicted of certain "nonrehabilitative" offenses were required to be dismissed.

Lawyers could not say how many people were fired under the law but estimated the number to be in the dozens. The law was changed in 2009 to give districts more discretion to retain people convicted of lesser offenses.

Vol. 30, Issue 10, Page 4

Published in Print: November 3, 2010, as Court Upholds Schools' Firing Of Workers for Old Crimes
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories