Can Tradition and Technology Coexist?

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Almost everyone understands by now that we are living through a time of extraordinary change. But what may be less readily apparent is the tremendous acceleration of change we are experiencing. Moore’s Law, which holds that computer capacities double every couple of years, is now applicable to many technologies and innovations. And though educators may know from their day-to-day experience that this is true, their students are feeling the full impact of these high-tech transformations.

Consider just one example, Facebook. Though this social-networking site is only about 5 years old, it has attracted enough users that, were it a country, Facebook would be the third most populous nation on the planet (after China and India). Its success illustrates the rapid spread and adoption of new tools that is a hallmark of the generation now in school. The sheer amount of information being generated is also expanding exponentially, and it is increasingly available, for good and for ill, at the click of a mouse.

These rapid changes are fueling a technological generation gap. As the digital education expert Marc Prensky has argued, today’s students are growing up as “digital natives,” while their teachers are relegated to operating as “digital immigrants.”

We can and must provide classrooms that reverberate with our students’ experience. This requires much more than computer screens in classes. It means making sure that students have not only up-to-date technological tools, but also the skill sets that will enable them to successfully use those tools for learning.

The task demands a reconsideration of what we, as educators and parents working together, want to impart to the next generation. For me, such a consideration leads necessarily to a combination of new and old, an optimal mix of skills for the 21st century.

The sheer amount of information being generated is also expanding exponentially, and it is increasingly available, for good and for ill, at the click of a mouse. These rapid changes are fueling a technological generation gap.

For many weeks this year, I kept three white boards in my office labeled, respectively, “Baby,” “Bathwater,” and “Fresh Water.” This was a way of helping my teachers, administrators, and myself categorize educational skill sets: traditional skills that retain their relevance (the “baby”); traditional skills that are being eclipsed by new developments (the “bathwater”); and skills that have not typically been central to traditional educational models, but are increasingly necessary in the world of today and tomorrow (the “fresh water”).

Consider, for example, how we train students to approach information. A high school student asks a librarian for help with a five-page research paper about marine invertebrates. Directing him to plod through the limited shelf of books available in a small high school library, most of which are woefully outdated, is less valuable than helping the student conduct an online search using today’s powerful search engines to scour vast resources almost instantaneously around key words. But it is also crucial that the teacher guide and train that student to be choosy about which sources to select from the many hits such a search will generate. He must know that an article from a respected, peer-reviewed science journal is going to be preferable to an amateur’s blog.

This example provides a model in miniature of the direction modern education might take. Culling information from individual silos/printed volumes is a skill moving to the margins (bathwater). What is needed instead are fresh-water skills such as digital literacy, meta-data gathering, data mining, and bias recognition. These skills, which include traditional educational values such as critical thinking and the ability to separate reliable from less rigorous sources (the baby), do not eliminate the need for learned guides, but quite the contrary: They require more than ever that students have teachers and librarians who train them in the most effective ways to surf the vast digital-information ocean. This can be overwhelming to those without the proper navigational skills. That is why, at my school, even as we have shifted to a digital-library format, we have increased our library staff by 25 percent.

Some of the other combinations of traditional and newer skills we need to place emphasis on as we prepare children for leadership in tomorrow’s world include those in the areas of play and creativity. Today’s students are used to learning in a virtual environment replete with games. Being able to harness such play for their school learning will go a long way toward fully engaging them. And, done properly, it will also allow them to be interactive content co-creators.

Estimates are that a third of young people today are creators of content on the Internet. The author and educational technology expert Alan November has spoken eloquently about the value of inviting today’s students to work alongside teachers in creating classroom materials. At Cushing Academy, where I am the headmaster, students have the opportunity to create digital presentations of key chapters in their textbooks—and the results have often made the teachers’ jaws drop.

The digital native vs. digital immigrant divide is real, and we teachers should not pretend we are the authorities on technology in the classroom. Give students a chance to show their digital savvy, and they will not only run circles around us, but also reinforce their learning and build their creativity and leadership skills. So, in addition to allowing them to be co-creators of content, we need to cede much of the mantle of technology guide to them. They can teach us how to really use these tools.

Does this mean that teachers are obsolete or “de-centered”? Hardly. Teachers remain the authorities in the classroom on content, analysis, and propriety. And they, as well as a new brand of librarians, will be more vital than ever for steering students to the best, and away from the most spurious sources of information in the digital world. What it does mean, though, is that 21st-century classrooms ought to be marked by not one center of authority—the teacher as all-knowing—but by two: the students as authorities on technology, with the teachers as content masters and learned guides.

Pretending otherwise only exposes us as phonies to the students. At Cushing, we have found that students respond with tremendous enthusiasm and learn much more passionately when they can bring some of their own experience and expertise to bear in working as co-creators, alongside the teacher, of the classroom learning experience. And the teachers are having more fun, too.

We are living through a great change in human society, marked especially by an acceleration in the speed with which we are accumulating and accessing knowledge on a global scale. It is myopic in the extreme for schools to fail to reconfigure their teaching methods and priorities amid such profound and rapid transformation. By the same token, we do not have to be disoriented or paralyzed by these developments. A considered admixture of the best from time-honored educational traditions with the most promising of the new skill sets emerging from our exploration of digital learning can lead to a more engaging school experience for today’s students, as they grow to be the 21st century’s leaders.

Vol. 36, Issue 29

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories