Could a Federal Takeover Save Public Education?

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

Any time I see a title as provocative as "Will We Ever Learn?" (Commentary, April 21, 2010) in an education periodical, it usually means the authors have been marginalized or otherwise uninvolved in the initiative, process, or reform they are trashing. It happens all the time with college professors who criticize school textbook publishers and their products: They could “right things” if only the “vendor” would contract with them for big bucks to write “correct” (that is, unedited) books.

In their Commentary, Robert I. Lerman and Arnold Packer are guilty of the same transgression—instead of focusing on the Common Core State Standards Initiative’s many justifications for its existence, they nitpick around the edges and imply that they could do it better.

Nothing short of a total federal takeover can solve public education’s worst problems—agitating, contrarian, and waffling academics with little content-area expertise; obstructionist unions; abysmal student achievement; teacher incompetence; and many others—and that’s not going to happen in this highly politicized U.S. “democracy.”

Alan Hull
Conyers, Ga.

Vol. 29, Issue 31, Page 35

Published in Print: May 12, 2010, as Could a Federal Takeover Save Public Education?
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories