Policy Brief

9th Circuit Choice Gets Timely Praise

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Goodwin H. Liu, a prominent constitutional scholar from the University of California, Berkeley who is an expert on educational equity issues, is facing a tough confirmation fight in the face of conservative opposition to his nomination to the federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

But a bipartisan group of education policy experts, including Stanford University’s Linda Darling-Hammond and the American Enterprise Institute’s Frederick M. Hess, has rallied to the defense of Mr. Liu, a former U.S. Department of Education official under President Bill Clinton.

The nomination has outraged some conservatives because of his support of traditionally liberal issues such as same-sex marriage and affirmative action, according to news media reports. Mr. Liu also has been mentioned as a potential U.S. Supreme Court nominee.

In a recent letter to key senators, a bipartisan group of 22 education policy experts urged the Senate to approve his nomination. The list includes Michael J. Petrilli of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, former U.S. Secretary of Education Richard W. Riley, Stanford University’s Eric A. Hanushek, New York City Schools Chancellor Joel I. Klein, and James W. Guthrie of the George W. Bush Institute.

The letterRequires Adobe Acrobat Reader praises Mr. Liu, who was to have a hearing late last week before the Senate Judiciary Committee, for his knowledge of and concern for issues facing disadvantaged students, declaring his work to be “nuanced and balanced, not dogmatic or ideological.”

“We do not necessarily agree with all of Professor Liu’s views,” the letter reads. “But we do agree that his record demonstrates the habits of rigorous inquiry, open-mindedness, independence, and intellectual honesty that we want and expect our judges to have.”

Mr. Liu has written extensively on education policy, including an essay in the Harvard Law & Policy Review in 2008 critical of the high court’s 2007 decision in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District, which sharply limits the ability of districts to take race into account in assigning students to schools.

Vol. 29, Issue 29, Page 18

Published in Print: April 21, 2010, as 9th Circuit Choice Gets Timely Praise
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories