Don't Confuse 'Forensics' With 'Forensic Science'

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

Please do not continue to encourage the improper use of the word “forensics” (“Forensics Courses Becoming Fixtures in Classrooms,” Oct. 28, 2009). The courses referred to in your recent article are courses in “forensic science”; forensics is argumentation in a court of law. The word is also used, and has been for the past 100-plus years, to refer to debate; take, for example, the National Forensic League, a student organization and honor society for speech and debate.

At our school, we offer forensics classes that study debate, and have offered forensic-science classes that examined the physical aspects of finding evidence for use in criminal cases. Both types of courses provide students great opportunities for learning, and both have a valid place within any high school curriculum. But it is important that we not allow forensic science to overshadow an enduring and worthwhile course of study, even if popular television series seem to convince us otherwise.

Steve Brown
Grand Junction High School
Grand Junction, Colo.

Vol. 29, Issue 11, Page 26

Published in Print: November 11, 2009, as Don't Confuse 'Forensics' With 'Forensic Science'
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories