Letter

Raymond-Hoxby 'Spat' Has Historical Resonance

October 26, 2009

To the Editor:

The spat between Stanford University colleagues Margaret E. Raymond and Caroline M. Hoxby over charter schools ("Scholars Spar Over Research Methods Used to Evaluate Charters," Oct. 14, 2009) is reminiscent of the brawl between John F. Witte of the University of Wisconsin-Madison and Harvard University’s Paul E. Peterson over vouchers in 1996. In both instances, the issue made headlines in major newspapers nationwide, with The Wall Street Journal running a story about the earlier debate on its front page on Oct. 11, 1996.

The major difference was that Messrs. Witte and Peterson looked at the same student data about vouchers in Milwaukee and reached opposite conclusions. Ms. Raymond looked at 15 states and the District of Columbia, while Ms. Hoxby focused only on New York City.

Despite the coverage, however, the Witte-Peterson controversy was never resolved to anyone’s complete satisfaction. If the past is any guide, the same thing will be true today in the Raymond-Hoxby dust-up.

Walt Gardner

Los Angeles, Calif.

Vol. 29, Issue 09, Page 27

Published in Print: October 28, 2009, as Raymond-Hoxby 'Spat' Has Historical Resonance

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.

Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Raymond-Hoxby 'Spat' Has Historical Resonance

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented

Raymond-Hoxby 'Spat' Has Historical Resonance

Get more stories and free e-newsletters!

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented

Sponsor Whitepapers