Raymond-Hoxby 'Spat' Has Historical Resonance

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

The spat between Stanford University colleagues Margaret E. Raymond and Caroline M. Hoxby over charter schools ("Scholars Spar Over Research Methods Used to Evaluate Charters," Oct. 14, 2009) is reminiscent of the brawl between John F. Witte of the University of Wisconsin-Madison and Harvard University’s Paul E. Peterson over vouchers in 1996. In both instances, the issue made headlines in major newspapers nationwide, with The Wall Street Journal running a story about the earlier debate on its front page on Oct. 11, 1996.

The major difference was that Messrs. Witte and Peterson looked at the same student data about vouchers in Milwaukee and reached opposite conclusions. Ms. Raymond looked at 15 states and the District of Columbia, while Ms. Hoxby focused only on New York City.

Despite the coverage, however, the Witte-Peterson controversy was never resolved to anyone’s complete satisfaction. If the past is any guide, the same thing will be true today in the Raymond-Hoxby dust-up.

Walt Gardner
Los Angeles, Calif.

Vol. 29, Issue 09, Page 27

Published in Print: October 28, 2009, as Raymond-Hoxby 'Spat' Has Historical Resonance
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Student Engagement Lessons from 3 Successful Districts

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >