Letter

On Reading, Will Obama Repeat Bush's Mistakes?

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

In response to "'Race to Top' Said to Lack Key Science" (Oct. 7, 2009), which reports on criticism among some education researchers that the Obama administration parallels the U.S. Department of Education under former President George W. Bush by offering insufficient evidence to support its policies:

It’s good to finally see some form of recognition in Education Week that the term “scientifically based reading research” was a cover for the imposition of a particularly narrow direct-instruction phonics methodology in the form of Reading First and the federal No Child Left Behind Act. A small group of ideologues used the phrase to promote its own tests and materials and to establish a de facto blacklist of methods and researchers.

Your sources were wrong, however, in their insistence that there is a lack of research on reading. Consensus is growing among researchers that reading is a process of making sense (constructing meaning), and that when beginning readers have access to well-written and authentic literature relevant to their interests and experiences, they not only learn to read, but also become lifelong readers.

Research over the past half-century, my own included, has provided considerable understanding of how people make sense of print. We also have learned much from a wide range of researchers about how reading develops in young learners. But this large base of research was marginalized and excluded by efforts to put the focus on a single, narrow view of reading instruction.

The Obama administration can open up support for research and the application of the existing rich research to teaching. If it continues to focus on quick cures, however, or to measure progress in terms of scores on skill tests, rather than productive reading, the administration will be wasting more billions on top of the $6 billion the Bush administration threw away.

Kenneth S. Goodman
Professor Emeritus
Department of Language, Reading, and Culture
College of Education
University of Arizona
Tucson, Ariz.

Vol. 29, Issue 08, Pages 26-27

Published in Print: October 21, 2009, as On Reading, Will Obama Repeat Bush's Mistakes?
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented

Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Student Engagement Lessons from 3 Successful Districts

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >