Reducing Segregation: Answers Lie in Socioeconomics, Not Charters

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

Susan Eaton and Gina Chirichigno’s recent online Commentary "Create Charter Schools That Reduce Segregation" (Aug. 6, 2009) serves as an important reminder of the part education has played in furthering racial integration in the United States. U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, New York City Schools Chancellor Joel I. Klein, and a host of policy wonks and school chiefs tell us that “education is the civil rights issue of the 21st century.” But we should remember that it was also the civil rights issue of the civil rights era.

There is reason that de jure segregation ended with an education court case, and that the civil rights era is symbolized by nine black students entering an Arkansas high school under armed guard. When we envision a right to education purely in terms of test scores and economic opportunity, we sell out the ideals of the pioneering civil rights activists who began the fight for equal educational opportunity.

Ms. Eaton and Ms. Chirichigno, though, seem to have forgotten about the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District and Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education, which effectively bans voluntary integration plans in publicly financed schools. The authors, and policymakers in general, would do well to look toward socioeconomic integration as a more viable, and perhaps preferable, alternative.

David Noah
Brooklyn, N.Y.

Vol. 29, Issue 01, Page 29

Published in Print: August 26, 2009, as Reducing Segregation: Answers Lie In Socioeconomics, Not Charters
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories