Criticism, and Some Praise, of A Nation at Risk Coverage

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

Clearly the public schools have failed. Your April 22, 2009, issue contains the second installment of articles this year recounting the 25th anniversary of A Nation at Risk, which told us so. A Nation at Risk appeared in 1983. This is 2009. Unless I was mistaught, or Education Week is using something different than the usual base-10 system, that’s 26 years, not 25.

The appearance of these articles does raise a serious political issue, however: Why is Education Week accepting money from the Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation to cover an event that happened 26 years ago? A look back at stories from this time in 2008 shows coverage of the 25th anniversary. So I ask, what is going on?

That said, Ronald A. Wolk remains one of the most cogent commentators on our educational condition, and his essay "Why We’re Still 'At Risk' " shows it. That makes it all the sadder that each day, in every way, Diane Ravitch’s observation seems increasingly true: In education, Barack Obama is a third term for George W. Bush, and Arne Duncan is Margaret Spellings in drag.

Gerald W. Bracey
Port Townsend, Wash.

Vol. 28, Issue 31, Page 31

Published in Print: May 13, 2009, as Criticism, and Some Praise, of A Nation at Risk Coverage
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories